|
|
Subject:
Mayor of London
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: dsloan-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
29 Sep 2005 13:00 PDT
Expires: 29 Oct 2005 13:00 PDT Question ID: 574326 |
#0 years ago I only remember there being a Lord Mayor of London. Now there's a Mayor, much like our mayors, and a Lord Mayor, ceremonial. When did the mayor like our mayor begin? Did they upgrade the position from something else, like the "chief executive"? |
|
Subject:
Re: Mayor of London
Answered By: juggler-ga on 29 Sep 2005 13:45 PDT |
Hello. The "Mayor of London" position was formally created by the British Parliament when they passed the Greater London Authority Act in 1999. This "Mayor of London" position was entirely new rather than an upgrade in the title of some existing job. Following an election on May 5, 2000, Ken Livingstone became the first Mayor of London under the Act. More information: "One of the main manifesto pledges of the Labour Party in 1997 was a referendum on the re-introduction of a democratically elected strategic authority for London, with a directly elected Mayor and Assembly. The referendum, held in May 1998, endorsed the setting up of the Greater London Authority by a three to one majority. The Greater London Authority Act received Royal Assent at the end of 1999. The legislation provided for an election for the Mayor and London Assembly - 14 constituency members elected by first past the post and 11 pan-London members to be elected by proportional representation... The first Mayor of London and London Assembly, consisting of 25 salaried members, were elected on 5 May 2000." source: A Short History of London Government http://www.london.gov.uk/london-life/city-government/history.jsp Also see: CityMayors.com - London Mayor http://www.citymayors.com/mayors/london_mayor.html Politics - London Government http://www.politics.co.uk/issues/london-government-$3277308.htm ----------- search strategy: "first mayor of london" "first mayor" "Greater London Authority Act" Thanks. |
|
Subject:
Re: Mayor of London
From: nelson-ga on 29 Sep 2005 16:32 PDT |
Not to be confused with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Mayor_of_London, who presides over the "square mile" of the City of London, as opposed to Greater London, which most outsiders think is the city of London. |
Subject:
Re: Mayor of London
From: myoarin-ga on 29 Sep 2005 18:41 PDT |
Nelson is quite right, the City of London is a very special area, governed - I believe - by the Corporation of London, also that the Queen by tradition must request the right to enter the "Square Mile". There had been earlier a Greater London Council, disbanded I think in Margaret Thatcher's time. The first and present head of the new greater London, held by Ken Livingston, is certainly not a figurehead, ceremonial office, whereas the Mayor of the City of Westminster, the area west of the City of London and now part of the Greater London Council, probably is. |
Subject:
Re: Mayor of London
From: juggler-ga on 29 Sep 2005 18:45 PDT |
The history of the earlier Greater London Council is discussed in the link that I cited above: "A Short History of London Government" http://www.london.gov.uk/london-life/city-government/history.jsp |
Subject:
Re: Mayor of London
From: jago8-ga on 30 Sep 2005 03:43 PDT |
I don't think the Mayor of London has as much power as "your" (presumably American?) mayors - see Wikipedia article on the Greater London Authority. The position has similar but I think fewer powers than the old head of the GLC (the GLC was abolished in 1986). Anyhow, the same man has the job - Ken Livingstone. Ken is considered by many to be something approaching a crook (see Wikipedia for a summary of his colourful history), and was elected on the grounds that it's better to have a crook who might get things done than a total nonentity. The Lord Mayor of London is head of the Corporation of London which runs the City as nelson-ga points out. The City is of course the financial district. The Lord Mayor is mostly a ceremonial position but he also does a fair bit of marketing the City as a financial centre. All this is less confusing if you know that the name London originally applied only to the area that is now the financial centre, and only later became a generic term for the entire metropolitan sprawl within the M25. For instance, the Great Fire of London of 1666 burned down London in the old sense. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London for more geographical detail. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |