![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
internal rate of return (irr) problem
Category: Business and Money > Accounting Asked by: lemontree-ga List Price: $9.50 |
Posted:
03 Oct 2005 11:22 PDT
Expires: 02 Nov 2005 10:22 PST Question ID: 575839 |
A firm wins a 20 year contract to supply water to N town. The initial
cash flow for the whole term the contract is:
cashflow 1:
1 2 3 4 5
-13,309,539 -5,658,618 -148,545 612,150 2,182,370
6 7 8 9 10
3,965,442 5,403,716 4,729,937 3,998,399 4,174,659
11 12 13 14 15
4,980,198 6,450,749 5,550,574 6,638,039 7,320,841
16 17 18 19 20
6,449,811 5,784,321 8,024,656 8,471,243 8,821,754
21
1,903,555
The contract is balanced for both parties when the irr is 16.96% (irr
of cashflow 1 is: 16.96%). They agree than in case the irr changes for
any reason, they have to take the necessary actions to return the irr
to the original value.
At the 5th year, the firm is obligated to add 2.000 new customers and
make new investments (to be able to provide water to the new
customers.)
The modified cashflow is the following (including the 2,000new
customers and modified to give a irr of 16.96%)
cashflow 2:
1 2 3 4 5
-13,309,539 -5,658,618 -148,545 612,150 2,182,370
6 7 8 9 10
4,168,916 8,697,065 8,015,531 3,509,228 3,684,437
11 12 13 14 15
4,486,721 5,949,376 5,053,022 6,132,526 6,819,464
16 17 18 19 20
5,940,412 5,279,390 7,511,646 7,957,840 8,305,431
21
1,816,124
irr of cashflow 2 (from year 1 to 21) = 16.96%
Question:
1. Explain why to correctly calculate the irr for cashflow 2 it's
necessary to take into account the cashflow results from year 1 to 21
and not only from year 5 to year 21 (when new investments and
customers where added).
- Answer should include math and theory explanation
thanks | |
|
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: internal rate of return (irr) problem
From: albionx-ga on 06 Oct 2005 19:09 PDT |
U can also think it as: if u calculated IRR from year 5 onwards, u wouldnīt get to a result cuz there isnīt any negative number to which u should discount ;) Anyway, the fact is that u should reconsider the entire period because the IRR is only valid for that length of time, and those values. If you went on and calculated IRR on the fifth period, even if you didnīt have any changes and had negative values so as to be able to discount, you wouldnīt reach the original IRR.It simply has nothing to do with the original IRR. If you took, for instance, the second period on, you would be discounting all the next ones for one period less, and not considering a real disembursement, which was the one in the first period. Itīs completely arbitrary and there is no way, except by mathmatical chance, u had the same IRR. Hope this helps. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |