Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Breech of Contract Statute of Limitations ( Answered,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Breech of Contract Statute of Limitations
Category: Reference, Education and News > General Reference
Asked by: toocleverforyou-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 05 Oct 2005 21:54 PDT
Expires: 04 Nov 2005 20:54 PST
Question ID: 576981
I am the claimant in a breech of contract dispute being resolved
by commercial arbitration rules through the American Arbitration
Association.  New York arbitration law will govern the process.  What
is the statute of limitations to file my claim?
Answer  
Subject: Re: Breech of Contract Statute of Limitations
Answered By: weisstho-ga on 06 Oct 2005 17:22 PDT
 
Hello, Clever. 

The easy answer is that the period of limitation for actions in
contract is six (6) years. My colleague, expertlaw, has a very nice
site that sets forth the New York statutes: 
http://www.expertlaw.com/library/limitations_by_state/New_York.html#3

Being Clever, I'm sure you have reviewed the American Arbitration
Ass'n website which is fantastic:  http://www.adr.org/

There is nothing directly disclosed by the AAA as to "periods of
limitation" and the default rule would be the governing rule of law in
the state that has jurisdiction over the dispute - New York, as you
disclose.

Now, what else might govern this issue?  The agreement itself - the
agreement that sets forth the requirement to arbitrate in lieu of a
civil action.

Many times the agreement (contract) will contain a limitation period
substantially shorter than the period permitted under law or court
rule. For example, Microsoft requires that certain contractual
disputes be brought within one year. 
https://accountservices.passport.net/PPTOU.srf?ru=http://login.passport.net/uilogin.srf%3Fid%3D2%26vv%3D310%26lc%3D1033&id=2&vv=310&lc=1033

An interesting question for we law nerds would be whether the
statutory period (6 years in this example) would remain if the
arbitration period would be artificially limited to a shorter period.
An argument (though not a great one) could be made that the right to a
judicial remedy would remain.

May I suggest that you not tarry in filing your claim. There are many,
many reasons for proffering such advice, and no need to lay them out
here. Suffice it to say that there are substantial risks in delay -
once your claim is ripe (both legally and informationally) you are
always wise to "get-r-done."

I hope this does the trick - please hit the clarification button if
there is ANYTHING else you need.

And, Good Luck in your action!

weisstho-ga

_________________________________________

Search Strategy:
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=new+york+statutes+of+limitation
Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy