My question is whether there is another country in the world that does
not accept the intellectual property law as an independent law branch,
besides Turkey. Because it seems that Turkey is the unique country in
that situation; for example, it is compulsory to answer questions in
the commerce law, not in the intellectual property law in the exams
for a candidate to be associate professor in Turkey and  although it
is against the main rules of scientific concept in EC, nobody knows it
in Europe.

Sorry, but this is not a "scientific scandal", but a view, that might
be disputed, but is not a "scandal", and it is not "against the main
rules of scientific concept" to claim that intellectual property law
is a sub-division of commercial law.

The qualifying courses for solicitors in England and Wales (*there are
other ways to become a solicitor), in other words the basic courses
and "sub disciplines" in law, are :
obligations 1 (contract)
obligations 2 (tort)
public law (including constitutional law, administrative law and human rights law)
criminal law
property law
equity and the law of trusts
law of the European Union

(SOURCE: The Law Society,
<http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/becomingasolicitor/waystoqualify/qualifying.law>).

The Staatsexamen in Germany, to become a lawyer, also consider
intellectual property law as a sub-brach, not as a main branch in the
discipline.

I still cannot see how administrative university policies are a
"scientific scnadal".