|
|
Subject:
Weapon of mass destruction
Category: Reference, Education and News > Current Events Asked by: allworldskates-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
28 Oct 2005 13:01 PDT
Expires: 27 Nov 2005 12:01 PST Question ID: 586127 |
if one cluster bomb filled with nerve agent is enough to kill thousands (a weapon of mass destruction) then how hard is it to find a six foot long by 2 feet diameter cluster bomb in a huge country like Iraq? I mean what are the chances of finding one - statistically speaking of course...and does it factor in that it may be hidden in a place so no one finds it? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Weapon of mass destruction
From: murunbuchstansinger-ga on 29 Oct 2005 08:27 PDT |
How can this be answered accurately? The "bomb" could be buried 50 feet under ground and hence entirely undetectable if a building was then constructed above it, or even hoisted in a tree in the middle of a forest - presuming Iraq has forests. Any expression of the "odds of finding a weapon" would surely be useless? |
Subject:
Re: Weapon of mass destruction
From: allworldskates-ga on 29 Oct 2005 15:05 PDT |
You don't want to know the odds? The chances? Saddam used them before so we know he had them, but where? What are the chances? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |