Supreme Court Locke v. Davey decision in 2004?
Category: Reference, Education and News > Current Events
Asked by: tocute4u1589-ga
List Price: $5.00
03 Nov 2005 17:08 PST
Expires: 03 Dec 2005 17:08 PST
Question ID: 588674
Did the Supreme Court correctly balance the constitutional tension between the free excercise and establishment clauses of the First Amendment in its Locke v. Davey (2004) decision?
|There is no answer at this time.|
Re: Supreme Court Locke v. Davey decision in 2004?
From: smartd00d-ga on 26 Nov 2005 18:39 PST
Yes. A state should have the right to try to abide by its own constitution, in an effort to meet the requirements of the establishment clause, by not providing funds for religious study--even when it does provide funds for non-religious study.
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at firstname.lastname@example.org with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
|Search Google Answers for|