Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Lawsuits against endowments or charitable organizations ( No Answer,   1 Comment )
Question  
Subject: Lawsuits against endowments or charitable organizations
Category: Business and Money > Finance
Asked by: hoile-ga
List Price: $100.00
Posted: 15 Nov 2005 05:29 PST
Expires: 15 Dec 2005 05:29 PST
Question ID: 593192
I'm looking for examples of endowment funds or charitable trusts being
sued for mismanaging the money under their control.  I'm not looking
for any lawsuits related to WorldCom or Enron.  Specifically, I'm
interested in whether any trust or endowment fund was sued not because
they lost money, but rather sued because the fund was invested too
conservatively and didn't make a higer rate of return.

Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 19 Nov 2005 08:38 PST
hoile-ga,

I'm pretty good at tracking down existing case law, lawsuits, and the like.  

But I think the odds are pretty slim of actually finding a case based
on your criteria -- a trust sued for investing too conservatively.  I
don't want to put in a large effort on this, if I'm likely to come up
empty-handed.

On the other hand, there are likely to be suits against trusts and
endownments regarding reckless investing.  If these are of interest,
let me know, and I'll see if I can provide them as an answer to your
question -- and I'd certainly look for suits that match your criteria,
but again, I don't think it likely I could find any.

So...let me know how, or if, you'd like me to proceed on this.  And
also, is there a particular state that is of interest to you,
regarding legal precedents in this matter?

Looking forward to hearing from you,

pafalafa-ga
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Lawsuits against endowments or charitable organizations
From: myoarin-ga on 20 Nov 2005 07:23 PST
 
It would be very difficult  - if not impossible -  to make a case for
such a suit since investment managers of such funds have a primary
obligation of protecting the principal, a strong defence against
accusations that they did not invest to maximize income.  Furthermore,
as we all know, with hindsight it is easy to identify investments that
would have been "a sure thing", but it is a different matter to pin
someone down for not having made the investment when it first became
available.

The subject is expressed in the "Prudent Man Rule"  

http://www.investorwords.com/3927/Prudent_Man_Rule.html 

and legislated in the UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT:

http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/fnact99/1990s/upia94.htm

I hope this is a help, Myoarin

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy