|
|
Subject:
Industrial Revolution Propaganda
Category: Business and Money > Economics Asked by: baddollar-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
17 Nov 2005 01:27 PST
Expires: 17 Dec 2005 01:27 PST Question ID: 594093 |
I need a detailed description of the propaganda techniques used by governments in countries as they experience/d the industrial revolution. A professor from Harvard once explained this to me and I was blown away. I am looking for the specific agenda used to create a 'working class' with the 'employee mentality' used by government agencies and public education programs. Whenever the industrial revolution hit (or hits with less advanced countries) there is an immediate change from an 'entrepreuner' society to a 'working class' society. I need to know when this change (probably in Britain I think) first was established and the rules used to instill such a dramatic change in mentality. A solid answer will have the explanation and 'inventors' of this massive paradigm shift and the model they use to make this happen. I also need very well documented sources for this info, preferably Harvard research centers. I also need links to credible sites for verification. Answer must also cover WHY this change was needed and who promoted and installed this belief and systems as well as a brief explanation of the industrial revolution's causes and effects. I need this question answered completely by Saturday 11-19-05. Thanks! |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Industrial Revolution Propaganda
From: frde-ga on 17 Nov 2005 03:05 PST |
When an Industrial Revolution hits, a large part of the population is pulled off the land into industrial centres eg: factories and mines. Depopulation of the agricultural workforce has very little effect as 'industrialization' makes farming and transport far more efficient. I'm not sure where the 'entrepreneur' bit comes in, the yokels from the farms were certainly not entrepreneurs and the people running the factories and mines are certainly not the people sucked off the land. It is pretty obvious that people pulled off the land need to live somewhere, so you get employers building barracks and low quality housing, not through altruism, but because they are necessary - and one can charge for them. Real industrialization is not so much a migration from the land to towns, as a migration from the land to new industrial centres that then become towns. I can only suppose that your Harvard professor was pointing out the difference between town dwellers (pre-industrialization which would have been merchant, small scale manufacturing and administration) and the new 'town dwellers' in the new towns - who are factory or mine fodder. To some extent the old towns and the new towns overlap, especially over time, so that looking at it over a long period one could say that industrialization moves the town population from bourgois to 'working class', although what is really happening is that industrial centres are becoming new towns, and old towns are expanding to encompass new industrial areas. Looking at what is going on in China is a good example. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |