What is the ownership record and stories of the real property: 1315
18th Street, Sacramento CA 95814, built 1900. this property was
rehabilitated in 2001 and won a local architecture award that year. i
beleive it is on some sort of historical Registry - I hope to have the
builder's name original owner and historical references - local
stories of interest about the building. |
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
22 Nov 2005 08:44 PST
Hello -
Thank you for your question.
I have located the original owner, along with people who have owned
the property since; however, I have verified with a record-keeping
office that, although there may be a publicly accessible written
record with information on the property, details on the contractor are
most likely not included. Notwithstanding, for $25, you can have the
office do specific research to look up the record for that property.
I'm still awaiting any additional information available on the property.
Is an answer without the name of the original builder of value?
jbf777
researcher
|
Clarification of Question by
sboydmar-ga
on
28 Nov 2005 14:37 PST
The answer and material that you have attained so far - would be
useful and interesting and I'd be satisfied - but - I'd like you to
pursue the information on the Contractor, as it would really complete
our story on this property. Please charge the additional $25 on the
American express card that I paid for the question - or - contact me
and I'll authorize an additional charge if necessary. thank you
Marcella Boyd 916-466=2299 x230
|
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
29 Nov 2005 09:42 PST
Hello -
I have only been able to track down the ownership record of the
property at this time. Despite looking, I have not been able to find
any interesting stories on the property as you have originally
requested. Are you interested in the ownership record for this
property? If so, you may lower the price of your question (if you
would like) to accommodate this information. Once you've done that, I
can post this information, and then you can post a tip for $25 -- this
will provide me with the funds necessary to pull the record on the
file with the office (again, I must stress, there is a slim to none
chance that the builder/contractor will be on that record).
jbf777
|
Clarification of Question by
sboydmar-ga
on
29 Nov 2005 11:07 PST
Yes Please conduct the possibly fruitless search for the contractor
name and I will tip the additional $25 to pay for this search. What do
you suggest the $200 fee be lowered to? thanks again
|
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
29 Nov 2005 17:52 PST
OK -- will do. With regard to setting the price, whatever you see fit.
Thanks,
jbf777
|
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
06 Dec 2005 20:45 PST
Hello -
Will you be leaving the question at $200?
jbf777
|
Clarification of Question by
sboydmar-ga
on
07 Dec 2005 10:42 PST
Are we done now?
|
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
07 Dec 2005 11:14 PST
My apologies -- I didn't clarify that the price alteration that we
were talking about actually has to occur on your part before we go any
further. There should be an "Edit Question Parameters" button or
something to that regard, that you can click and change the price of
the question.
Thanks,
jbf777
|
Clarification of Question by
sboydmar-ga
on
07 Dec 2005 12:30 PST
no changes to the 200 fee offered
|
Clarification of Question by
sboydmar-ga
on
07 Dec 2005 15:20 PST
Yes the $200 fee remains the same plus the additional $25 for fee for
record request for contractor name. marcella boyd
|
Request for Question Clarification by
jbf777-ga
on
07 Dec 2005 19:58 PST
Thank you...
|