|
|
Subject:
Age of the universe versus gamma ray bursts
Category: Science > Astronomy Asked by: rambler-ga List Price: $12.00 |
Posted:
26 Nov 2005 12:08 PST
Expires: 26 Dec 2005 12:08 PST Question ID: 597807 |
I was reading Discover magazine recently. One article said that the universe is about 13.7 billion years old. Another article said that one gamma ray burst was determined to be about 12.8 billion light years away. Those two articles made me wonder how, in a ?mere? 13.7 billion years, the universe could have expanded 12.8 billion light years in all directions, and THEN have the light of the most distant gamma ray bursts travel all the way back to Earth (i.e. another 12.8 billion years). 12.8 plus 12.8 equals 25.6 If the universe is only 13.7 billion years old, how do astronomers explain the 25.6 billion years needed for some galaxies to have moved enormous distances and send their gamma rays back to Earth? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Age of the universe versus gamma ray bursts
From: kottekoe-ga on 26 Nov 2005 23:37 PST |
That's a really good question and I hope a General Relativist gives us an authoritative answer. For an object that far away, the curvature of space will certainly play a role. Part of the answer however, is that the object in question was not 12.8 billion light years away from us when the light was emitted. That is the distance now, but the light was emitted when it was closer to us. To get this right, one has to be very pedantic about what "time" and "distance" we are talking about. It helps to draw space-time diagrams to understand this. |
Subject:
Re: Age of the universe versus gamma ray bursts
From: iang-ga on 27 Nov 2005 15:22 PST |
The answer, in a word, is inflation. The theory is that when the universe was only a tiny fraction of a second old it expanded at much more than the speed of light for another tiny fraction of a second. By doing this, it managed to avoid a lot of the problems with the big bang such as the one you've highlighted. Because it was the entire universe that was expanding, that doesn't violate relativity! The Wikipedia article is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_inflation . The theory was first proposed in the early 1980s by Alan Guth, and somewhere on the web you can find an audio file of him explaining the theory - it's well worth a listen! Ian G. |
Subject:
Re: Age of the universe versus gamma ray bursts
From: kottekoe-ga on 27 Nov 2005 19:11 PST |
Inflation makes the question even more interesting, but it is still a valid question in a universe without inflation. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |