![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Collection agencies
Category: Business and Money Asked by: snesprogrammer-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
30 Nov 2005 15:43 PST
Expires: 30 Dec 2005 15:43 PST Question ID: 599724 |
Here is the situation: I am an independent seller (not a registered business). I have sold some documentation. I have signature proof the buyer received the documentation. A couple weeks later he called his credit card company and reversed the transaction, screwing me over. I have the transaction recorded in paypal, and the agreement recorded in emails. I know the buyer's name, address, phone number, and employer. Here is the question: I want to send a collections agency to retrieve my money. How do I do this? And can you recommend some agencies that would work with me? Thanks, FeelingTheInternetBlues... |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: markvmd-ga on 30 Nov 2005 18:23 PST |
If you have proof the buyer okayed the purchase and received the service or items, you should be able to provide the credit card company this information to reverse the chargeback. Contact the credit card company for information on how to provide supporting documentation against a chargeback. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: snesprogrammer-ga on 30 Nov 2005 21:04 PST |
Oh, this sounds interesting! But I am not understanding how I go about doing this. The credit card transaction actually happens on PayPal's side. I don't even know what credit card company he used. I tried complaining to PayPal, but they say he claims "he didn't get what he ordered" (which is bullshit, he asked for papers meeting certain detailed requirements, which I found and then sent to him) and PayPal says they do not deal with such situations. So there is no issue about whether he authorized the payment or not. Do I have to somehow prove to the credit card company that the "product" met the "specifications"? The papers he requested are quite technical in nature and I'm not sure anyone at the credit card company would understand the details. Even if he "returned them" (which he didn't) I know that just means he made a copy for himself. There were no provisions in the agreement for returning the item and refusing the service once paid for (because then I'd get ripped off by even more people). ... Anyway, are you trying to imply that if I lose the arguement with the credit card company that I can't get a collections agency to get my money from the person? I really hope you are not implying that. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: markvmd-ga on 01 Dec 2005 00:00 PST |
See, now you are getting outside what my comment can cover. We will need to leave this up to an Answerer to research and consider this a clarification. But I see no reason you cannot take this to collections. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: snesprogrammer-ga on 01 Dec 2005 11:26 PST |
Okay, thank you very much for your comments. Working more with PayPal it is becoming very obvious that the buyer is always considered correct in these instances, regardless. Or at least PayPal feels that way. If someone knows how to remedy this, I'd love to hear how. But, until then, back to the collections agencies... (and your final comment has me hopeful, I hope it really is possible) |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: markvmd-ga on 01 Dec 2005 11:41 PST |
Puh-leez note that I didn't say how effective a collection agency would be. On small amounts-- under $1000-- I have found them to be about as useful as a iPod for your grandmother. If they (or you, for that matter) can file a lein against the buyer you might one day have hope of collecting if, say, they go to buy a car or house. If you aren't too far from the buyer, you may want to sue in small claims court. Details of where you live may be helpful to a Google Answerer in coming up with a good solution. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: snesprogrammer-ga on 01 Dec 2005 13:16 PST |
> Puh-leez note that I didn't say how effective a > collection agency would be. Don't worry. I have a healthy skepticism of ever being able to retrieve this money. I just want to pursue every means possible. In reply to your questions/comments: These are actually two separate transactions totalling $4000. The buyer is, to say it modestly, not exactly strapped for cash. So availability of funds is not an issue. I'm not sure why he is risking his credit rating over something so childish. What's frustrating is it looks like he might get away with it. I reside in Illinois. He resides in California. I have already looked it up, and it appears I can still file small claims (from the residence of my end of the business transaction). However, small claims court is really scary to me, because considering the cases they usually preside over, and how quickly they try to go through cases, I do not trust the judge to understand the technical details of the papers ... and if I lose I'd have to pay court costs as well as any "inconvenience" the buyer claims (such as even flying out there I believe). As for a lein, I don't know how these work. Do I have to first win a court decision, or can I just file one of these with proof of money owed (and he'd have to file a court complaint if he really wants to dispute it to that level)? |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: closeup2-ga on 01 Dec 2005 14:38 PST |
I think you will find Small Claims Court the best option. You sound like you have adequate documentation to present a winning case. I don't think the technical aspect of the papers matter much. You can show you kept your end of the deal, he can't. IE, he'll be on the defensive. A collection agency is going to want a sizable bite of that four thousand. What the collection agency will do is in a sense buy this debt from you. The price they will pay is based on how much (if anything) they think they'll be able to collect. Call a lawyer, have a letter written on their letterhead, and stating you have absolutely no intention of not collecting every cent he agreed to, plus the added expense of your collection efforts. If you win in small claims court, you will probably receive interest on the money until you collect it. I hope this has been helpful. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: snesprogrammer-ga on 01 Dec 2005 19:56 PST |
Yes, your comment is helpful. Thank you. I didn't realize that was how collection agencies work. They actually buy the debt... so you don't have to deal with it anymore? At this point, Garaunteed money is worth a consider (even if they do charge an arm and a leg). I would at least like to know about this option. So, any google researcher, I am still interested in a response. Thank you. > I don't think the technical aspect of the papers matter much. You can > show you kept your end of the deal, he can't. I am actually afraid I will be on the defensive. He will say "that's not what I requested". I will be on the defensive and have to prove my case. To show that the documentation met his request, I will have to get into the technical details ... which he'll probably argue. He can probably win just by raising the level of the debate above the judge's head ... in which case, since he'd be putting me in the defensive, I'd lose. A safe bet, even if it is just recovering half the money, is looking like a good option. (Plus, not dealing with the legal system is always a bonus.) |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: markvmd-ga on 01 Dec 2005 21:09 PST |
No, Snes, as Closeup said the collection agency "in a sense" buys the debt. When/if they collect, they take a cut. There are companies that will outright buy your debt as well. It is not unusual to expect to sell a $4000 debt for about a hundred dollars, or 2 to 3 cents on the dollar. The details of a case in small claims court are only a part of the process. The judge will listen to the explanation of both sides and consider how plausible each side is. (S)He may watch each testifier for signs of lying or evasion, or if one contradicts one's own statements made in the complaint or answer, or contradicts one's own testimony. Successfully lying while under examination by a person who is expert at his or her job of the law is pretty tough. You don't have to overwhelm the judge, just tip the balance in your favor. One thing that may weigh against your opponent (in my opinion, and I am not an attorney) in this matter is the fact he paid you and canceled the payment without notice to you. You have documentation showing the work was acceptable, he will have none saying otherwise. Then say he claims to have told you orally; you could (in theory) have the defendant establish when he told this to you and then produce your phone records showing no calls to (or, in the case of a cell phone, from) the defendant in the time frame he cites. Small claims courts are fascinating places. Visit one. |
Subject:
Re: Collection agencies
From: snesprogrammer-ga on 01 Dec 2005 22:56 PST |
Okay, thank you for the clarification regarding collection agencies. And maybe I'll go watch some small claims cases at the local courthouse during a lunch break. Hopefully that will help me understand the process a bit better. This is all fascinating. However, for completeness, I would like to reiterate to any Google researchers that I am still interested in knowing about collection agencies. It is well worth $20 for future reference. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |