|
|
Subject:
integral and ti-89
Category: Science > Math Asked by: sergiobenavides-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
01 Dec 2005 10:14 PST
Expires: 06 Dec 2005 04:04 PST Question ID: 600089 |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: integral and ti-89
From: hfshaw-ga on 01 Dec 2005 10:48 PST |
If you have written the integral properly, the answer you think "should" be correct, isn't. From a table of indefinite integrals: Integral of {exp(ax)*cos(bx) dx} = exp(ax)*[a*cos(bx) + b*sin(bx)]/(a^2 + b^2) + constant in your case, a = -1/2, and b = 2*n. Plug in these values, and then use the limits of integration to turn the indefinite integral result into a definite integral result. That results in: (2/pi)*[exp(-pi/2)*(-0.5*cos(2*pi*n) + 2*n*sin(2*pi*n)) - exp(0)*(-0.5*cos(0) + 2*n*sin(0)]/[1/4 + 4*n^2] Now, exp(0) = 1, cos(0) = 1, and sin(0) = 0. Furthermore, for any integral value of n (you didn't specify that n must be integral in your question, but I assume this is the case), cos(n*2*pi) = 1, and sin(n*2*pi) = 0. The result then simplifies to: (2/pi)*[exp(-pi/2) * (-1/2) + 1/2]/[1/4 + 4*N^2] |
Subject:
Re: integral and ti-89
From: hfshaw-ga on 01 Dec 2005 10:53 PST |
From a table of indefinite integrals: Integral of {exp(ax)*cos(bx) dx} = exp(ax)*[a*cos(bx) + b*sin(bx)]/(a^2 + b^2) + constant in your case, a = -1/2, and b = 2*n. Plug in these values, and then use the limits of integration to turn the indefinite integral result into a definite integral result. That results in: (2/pi)*[exp(-pi/2)*(-0.5*cos(2*pi*n) + 2*n*sin(2*pi*n)) - exp(0)*(-0.5*cos(0) + 2*n*sin(0)]/[1/4 + 4*n^2] Now, exp(0) = 1, cos(0) = 1, and sin(0) = 0. Furthermore, for any integral value of n (you didn't specify that n must be integral in your question, but I assume this is the case), cos(n*2*pi) = 1, and sin(n*2*pi) = 0. The result then simplifies to: (2/pi)*[exp(-pi/2) * (-1/2) + 1/2]/[1/4 + 4*N^2] Multiplying through by 4/4 and simplifying results in: (2/pi)* [-2*exp(-pi/2) + 2]/[1+16*n^2]. Evaluating the exponential and doing a little more arithemetic results in your answer: 0.50428*(2/(1+16*n^2)) |
Subject:
Re: integral and ti-89
From: hfshaw-ga on 01 Dec 2005 10:54 PST |
Ignore that first comment. I hit "post" by mistake. |
Subject:
Re: integral and ti-89
From: fractl-ga on 01 Dec 2005 11:12 PST |
Before I give the derivation a shot, let me confirm with you what I got on my calc (I'm using a Voyage200, OS 3.10). It behaves just like an 89 with the exception of a larger screen and a qwerty keyboard. There have been some changes in the algebra handling since earlier versions of the OS, so we may not be getting the same result. according to Buttons (that's his name, ya know): -pi -pi pi --- --- -x 2 2 2 SS --- -4*cos(2n*pi)*e 16*n*sin(2*n*pi)*e 4 --- * S 2 * cos(2nx) dx = ----------------- + -------------------- + -------------------- pi SS e (16*n^2+1)*pi (16*n^2+1)*pi (16*n^2+1)*pi (i really hope this won't wordwrap, expect a followup if it does) I have yet to find the calculator wrong in its integration (more often than not it takes into account factors integration tables ignore). I wouldn't give it much praise for simplifying the answers well, though... I hope this will help any researchers that may not have immediate access to an advanced graphing calculator. |
Subject:
Re: integral and ti-89
From: fractl-ga on 01 Dec 2005 11:17 PST |
Okay...fixed up for your viewing pleasure: pi -x 2 SS --- --- * S 2 * cos(2nx) dx = [continued below?] pi SS e 0 -pi -pi --- --- 2 2 -4*cos(2n*pi)*e 16*n*sin(2*n*pi)*e 4 ----------------- + -------------------- + -------------- (16*n^2+1)*pi (16*n^2+1)*pi (16*n^2+1)*pi |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |