Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron ( No Answer,   7 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
Category: Science
Asked by: 8ds-ga
List Price: $23.00
Posted: 03 Dec 2005 10:59 PST
Expires: 19 Dec 2005 15:48 PST
Question ID: 600949
I need to identify a dense material to be used in a bean bag.  The
material has to be available as small (<3mm diameter) pellets, beads,
balls, or spheres.  The material should be more dense and less
expensive than Iron.  It should be safe for contact with human skin or
accidental ingestion.

Please also provide ways or contacts to obtain such a material,
already manufactured as small pellets, beads, balls, or spheres.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: qed100-ga on 03 Dec 2005 15:58 PST
 
Just curious: Why does it have to be more dense than iron?
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: kottekoe-ga on 03 Dec 2005 16:23 PST
 
It is a pretty tall order to be both more dense than iron and at the
same time less expensive and non-toxic.

Here is a table of densities of some common materials:

http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_metals.htm

There is also a link to a table for metals. You might also try this link:

http://www.mcelwee.net/html/densities_of_various_materials.html#sorted

According to these tables, iron has a density of 7.8 gm/cc and
stainless steel is slightly higher at up to 8.0. Copper is slightly
more dense at 8.9, as are copper alloys like brass and bronze. But it
is hard to beat iron or steel on cost. If you want something
considerabily more dense, you could consider something toxic like lead
11.3 or plutonium 19.8! Or you could use something expensive like gold
19.3, tungsten 19.6, platinum 21.4, iridium 22.2, or my favorite,
osmium 22.6.
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: muham-ga on 04 Dec 2005 04:48 PST
 
Iron is the cheapest metal. The only cheaper material would be some
kind of mineral (something you just mine out of ground) or a
waste-product that somebody is eager to get rid of.

At the density and price you demand, you are completely unrealistic.
AND your reward is laughable, you cheepo.
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: gold1912-ga on 04 Dec 2005 17:51 PST
 
It is probably going to be lead, in the form of be-be balls for guns.
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: gold1912-ga on 04 Dec 2005 17:52 PST
 
lead alloy that is contained in be-be gun balls
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: bcreid83-ga on 06 Dec 2005 09:11 PST
 
If you are going to be making bean bags... another point to consider
is this - a bean bag denser than iron is going to be really heavy. 
Even a relatively small bag will weigh quite a bit, so the fabric will
need to be very strong to keep it from tearing itself apart.  Also, I
wouldn't try to have bean-bag fights with hunks of lead.....
Subject: Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: harveycobalt-ga on 06 Dec 2005 19:06 PST
 
rocks

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy