|
|
Subject:
Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
Category: Science Asked by: 8ds-ga List Price: $23.00 |
Posted:
03 Dec 2005 10:59 PST
Expires: 19 Dec 2005 15:48 PST Question ID: 600949 |
I need to identify a dense material to be used in a bean bag. The material has to be available as small (<3mm diameter) pellets, beads, balls, or spheres. The material should be more dense and less expensive than Iron. It should be safe for contact with human skin or accidental ingestion. Please also provide ways or contacts to obtain such a material, already manufactured as small pellets, beads, balls, or spheres. |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: qed100-ga on 03 Dec 2005 15:58 PST |
Just curious: Why does it have to be more dense than iron? |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: kottekoe-ga on 03 Dec 2005 16:23 PST |
It is a pretty tall order to be both more dense than iron and at the same time less expensive and non-toxic. Here is a table of densities of some common materials: http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_metals.htm There is also a link to a table for metals. You might also try this link: http://www.mcelwee.net/html/densities_of_various_materials.html#sorted According to these tables, iron has a density of 7.8 gm/cc and stainless steel is slightly higher at up to 8.0. Copper is slightly more dense at 8.9, as are copper alloys like brass and bronze. But it is hard to beat iron or steel on cost. If you want something considerabily more dense, you could consider something toxic like lead 11.3 or plutonium 19.8! Or you could use something expensive like gold 19.3, tungsten 19.6, platinum 21.4, iridium 22.2, or my favorite, osmium 22.6. |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: muham-ga on 04 Dec 2005 04:48 PST |
Iron is the cheapest metal. The only cheaper material would be some kind of mineral (something you just mine out of ground) or a waste-product that somebody is eager to get rid of. At the density and price you demand, you are completely unrealistic. AND your reward is laughable, you cheepo. |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: gold1912-ga on 04 Dec 2005 17:51 PST |
It is probably going to be lead, in the form of be-be balls for guns. |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: gold1912-ga on 04 Dec 2005 17:52 PST |
lead alloy that is contained in be-be gun balls |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: bcreid83-ga on 06 Dec 2005 09:11 PST |
If you are going to be making bean bags... another point to consider is this - a bean bag denser than iron is going to be really heavy. Even a relatively small bag will weigh quite a bit, so the fabric will need to be very strong to keep it from tearing itself apart. Also, I wouldn't try to have bean-bag fights with hunks of lead..... |
Subject:
Re: Material more dense and less expensive than Iron
From: harveycobalt-ga on 06 Dec 2005 19:06 PST |
rocks |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |