|
|
Subject:
Wireless signal
Category: Science > Technology Asked by: steve1001-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
05 Dec 2005 16:07 PST
Expires: 04 Jan 2006 16:07 PST Question ID: 601897 |
I would like to know what kind of wireless signal would be able to: 1. Be transmitted from coast to coast and back without any repeater. 2. Would not be detected by a frequency analyzer sweeping in the range of 30Mhz to 15 GHz. 3. would not interfere with cell phone, tv, radio signals. 4. Would not be blocked by building walls, underground tunnels, etc. 5. Would not be blocked by a magnetically shielded roome like the one in this system, or be detected by a the equipment used in this system. http://web.mit.edu/kitmitmeg/sysfull.html#The%20Room%20itself 6. Can transmit an Audio and Video signal. |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Wireless signal
From: denco-ga on 05 Dec 2005 19:38 PST |
Check out HAARP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP |
Subject:
Re: Wireless signal
From: formica34-ga on 07 Dec 2005 04:56 PST |
That's a virtually impossible set of contraints. You could probably manage at most any two of those six at the same time. 1. The only way to get reliable coast-to-coast range (I'm assuming the US coast) is with HF or lower frequencies. VHF or higher will require line of sight. The other alternative is satellite broadcast - this is probably your best bet! 2. The power and bandwidth necessary for video would make the signal very noticable, since you'd be using a large chunck of the spectrum. You could use spread sprectrum techniques to hide your signal in the background noise, but the high power and data rate you'd need for coast-coast video would make it unlikely that you'd stay hidden for long. 3. This is fairly easy if you avoid the frequencies they use, which you'd have to anyone to get country-wide range (except perhaps for AM radio) 4. Normal building walls wouldn't be any worse than the are for AM radio. Underground tunnels are much harder - it is virtually impossible to get RF video through even a few meters of dirt. There's especially no way you could manage it with the transmitter located halfway across the country, without a repeater underground. 5. It looks like that room is pretty well shielded with mu-metal and copper to block magnetic and electric fields. It would be extremely difficult to get through that from any distance. 6. This is easy, except when you through in the other contraints! |
Subject:
Re: Wireless signal
From: eestudent-ga on 05 Feb 2006 14:24 PST |
formica34-ga pretty much beat me to the punch. However: * If is very hard to transmit video on HF, unless you will use multiple carriers, and perhaps U/L SSB. * Why should it not be detectable? If we are speaking about HF, the transmitter will require multi-kW power. If you want to do it the right way, you will probably need a license. * DX'ers can speak throught the world with a big antenna. HF can bend around the terrain. Research ham radio. * While you are at MIT, why don't you also develop sub-space communications? That would certainly solve the problem... * If you want something undetectable, you can use underground communications, when the antenna is buried. However, the size of the antenna, the power, diffictuly of detection, very low frequency and bandwidth would make it only suitable for military voice and message communications. * What the heck are you doing? * Telepathy should be able to travel coast to coast. Are you trying to read the UC Berkeley research right from the professors' brains? * You can always use the HF way of multiple ionoshpere--ground bounces to transmit. This might require good hardware and software to be reliable. * Looks like you will need help from the Stanford Egg experiment and guests that appear on coasttocoastam.com * Any more questions? |
Subject:
Re: Wireless signal
From: eestudent-ga on 06 Feb 2006 13:33 PST |
Correction: Princeton Eggs experiment |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |