![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Daniel Quinn's Ishmael
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: gagglejenny-ga List Price: $30.00 |
Posted:
17 Dec 2005 13:10 PST
Expires: 16 Jan 2006 13:10 PST Question ID: 606893 |
I?ve read references in several books (most recently, Daniel Quinn?s Ishmael) to the ?fact? that ancient hunter-gatherers only worked three hours a day and had abundant leisure time. I?m wondering: 1) What is the basis of these claims? 2) Is that 3 hours spent gathering food or 3 hours doing all the things necessary for survival? 3) What is meant by ?leisure? in this context? 4) If this is based on a study, does the study have any scientific credibility according to today?s anthropologists? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Daniel Quinn's Ishmael
From: milesc-ga on 17 Dec 2005 13:26 PST |
As I'm away from home right now, I cannot inform you of the exact quote or page number, however, I recently finished reading Guns, Germs, and Steel, a Pulitzer prize winning book, which discusses such things as the evolution of the hunter gatherer societies. The author of that text seemed to believe that those people spent a much greater amount of time per day than three hours. I'm just pointing out that not all sociologists/anthropologists would agree with Daniel Quinn. If I get back home soon, I will locate the passage I'm referring to. All the best, Craig |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |