Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Math ( No Answer,   5 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Math
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: mathom-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 17 Dec 2005 16:37 PST
Expires: 16 Jan 2006 16:37 PST
Question ID: 606945
If I have to allocate 130 days (work schedule Jan-June weekdays) in
the following manner why doesn't the total come out to 130 days? 2
people work 40% (52 days); 2 work 20%(26 days). 52 + 52+26+26+=156? (I
was never good at math, after open-heart surgery--and when tired my
brain does not work properly)
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Math
From: pinkfreud-ga on 17 Dec 2005 17:03 PST
 
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but consider your math this way:

40% + 40% + 20% + 20% = 120%.

If only one person worked 20%, you'd have 100%, which would be 130.

Does that make any sense? My brain isn't working too well tonight, either. ;-)
Subject: Re: Math
From: myoarin-ga on 18 Dec 2005 05:15 PST
 
That was a very tactful way of suggesting the correct answer, Pink  -
or was your mind really not working too well?  ;)

Maybe the persons don't work full time  - or not all of them -  so
that two or more are working on some of the 130 days.
Subject: Re: Math
From: mathom-ga on 20 Dec 2005 14:51 PST
 
Pinkfreud is exceedingly gracious...  Myoarin is
insightful/inciteful... We had a thunderstorm Saturday night when I
was working on this and rain gives me migraines.  (I am a mess...but
manage to work 50 hours a week for a genius.)  Typically, I do not
second-guess him.  He said give 40% to A, 40% to B, and 20% to me and
C.  I heard 20% each for the last two doctors and kept trying to make
120 come out to 100%.  Numbers have never been my forte.  (I can
design a dress, make the pattern and sew it up, but cannot add 2 + 2
under certain conditions...)

Again, thank you for the thoughtful replies.
Subject: Re: Math
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 Dec 2005 14:55 PST
 
From your description, it sounds to me as if the 20% is meant to be
split between the last two people, rather than having 20% allocated to
each person.
Subject: Re: Math
From: myoarin-ga on 20 Dec 2005 15:33 PST
 
I was going on the basis that there had to be four people and thinking (?)
Pink might have meant "If only one person worked 40% ..."

Anyway, I have a great respect for people who can make dress patterns.
My mother  - bless her soul -  could, once a strapless dress for my
sister from a small photo.  When it was successfully finished, she
inadvertantly caused great amusement with the comment:  "You know,
with a strapless dress, there are a couple of difficult points."

I hope the weather has improved.
Cheers, Myoarin

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy