|
|
Subject:
unkillable process
Category: Computers > Operating Systems Asked by: gobelet-ga List Price: $4.00 |
Posted:
21 Dec 2005 05:50 PST
Expires: 29 Dec 2005 01:07 PST Question ID: 608403 |
hi, sometimes i can't kill a process that crashed. windows xp doesn't seem to want to kill it. It stops responding, then I try to kill it using Task Manager. I press the kill process button, it asks me if I want to kill it, and then nothing happens. I can repeat the action a few times, but nothing happens. If I try to shutdown the computer, it won't work either. i have to power it down. What's the issue here? Is it some kind of orphan process the system lost? I'm using Windows XP SP2. I didn't find the way to reproduce the bug, it happens from time to time. Thank you! | |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: mister4u-ga on 21 Dec 2005 07:43 PST |
http://www.xmlsp.com/pview/prcview.htm http://www.winpatrol.com/ These programs will help identify and stop any process http://www.hoverdesk.net Use Regseeker from this page it will clean any orphan programs from your registry |
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: bobbie7-ga on 22 Dec 2005 10:19 PST |
This happens to me about once a week. When Internet Explorer hangs and I try to end the process with task manager, nothing happens. This is what I do: I terminate dumprep.exe ( under Processes in the Task Manager ) and then all my Internet Explorer windows close. I don't know why this happens, but terminating dumprep.exe helps. |
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: wordless-ga on 23 Dec 2005 21:25 PST |
I used to kill the unkillable processes on my computer using a tool named "KillProcess". It is just a small "killprocess.exe" program. You may get and try it from http://www.softtreetech.com/24x7/archive/49.htm |
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: linuxmatt-ga on 28 Dec 2005 17:43 PST |
I am unsure of what is causing this problem, but it happens to me occasionally. I believe the problem is in dumprep.exe. When a program crashes or you kill a task manually, Windows XP launches dumprep.exe. It seems dumprep.exe holds the dead program's state to, in a sense, 'secure the crash scene from contamination'. Similar to crime dramas :). dumprep.exe then dumps the program's section of the memory and such to a crash report file on the hard disk. Again, like a crime drama, it's collecting evidence. dumprep.exe then summarizes the crash data and offers to send it to Microsoft. Like sending evidence to the district attourney. (OK, I think I watch too much CSI and Law & Order) Next time this happens, search for dumprep.exe in the Task Manager. Kill that process and if the crashed app goes away shortly after that, then dumprep is likely taking too long. Thankfully, in all the times I've killed dumprep.exe, it's never respawned to investigate its own death. That could get messy (lol). If dumprep.exe is holding things up, check the Task Manager to see the CPU usage of dumprep.exe. If dumprep.exe seems to be doing something, wait about ten minutes. It should clear up and offer to send the crash data. If you don't want to send the crash data though, go ahead and kill dumprep.exe. If the problem is frequent, as in dumprep taking its time nearly every time a program crashes, I would do the following: 1: run "chkdsk C: /F" and answer "yes". 2: reboot and allow chkdsk to run. 3: exit all non-system programs, processes and services. 4: run "defrag C:". 5: reboot Then run something that crashes easily to test whether this helped. Also, turning off Error Reporting should allow dumprep.exe to either not launch in the first place or exit immediately. But then you might have drwatson to deal with, and depending on the system, that could work better or worse. However, if you turn off both Error Reporting and "Notify me when critical errors occur", that should cause both dumprep and drwatson to stay out of the way. However, I don't like using that option because then a crashed program will exit silently and without logging the crash, making it more difficult to troubleshoot. I know this is very in-depth for a comment, and could qualify as an answer. The reason I'm not posting this as an answer is that I have no sources to cite, and I am not entirely certain of my solution. I hope this helps you. ---linuxmatt[at]gmail[dot]com |
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: linuxmatt-ga on 28 Dec 2005 17:44 PST |
Oh and another reason I'm not posting it as an answer is it seems I'm not authorized :P |
Subject:
Re: unkillable process
From: gobelet-ga on 29 Dec 2005 01:04 PST |
Thanks for all those answers. linuxmatt, your answer is really interesting, and I think that's what's happening. I'm gonna send you $5 by Paypal, since you're not authorized. I'm gonna cancel the question afterwards. Thanks to everyone else too! I appreciate. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |