|
|
Subject:
Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: fredsfriend-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
26 Dec 2005 08:24 PST
Expires: 25 Jan 2006 08:24 PST Question ID: 609827 |
My car was hit by an ederly driver found at fault by the police. My girlfriends knee was injured. No broken bones, but cartilage damage and psychological effects from the accident. Should I trust the insurance company to ante up with a fair monetary offer for medical bills and pain and suffering, or should I hire a lawyer and risk losing a third of the offer? If so, why? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
From: markvmd-ga on 26 Dec 2005 12:21 PST |
Your girlfriend needs to consult with an attorney that represents her (that is, the attorney is paid by her) before signing anything. Her rights to sue in the future will most likely be abrogated with a settlement. You may need your own representation as well, as she might be able to sue YOU for damages in the future. Didn't think of THAT one, didja? The couple of bucks it costs is well worth it. Some lawyers will even do an initial consult for free. And did you actually write the words "Should I trust the insurance company"? I have a beautiful bridge that runs between lower Manhattan and Brooklyn for sale; are you interested? Oh, and I am also the former Nigerian Grand Poobah trying to get $100 million out of the country and need your help, for which I will pay you thirty bajillion dollars. Additionally, I will buy that bike you advertised on Craigslist for ten bucks and pay with a Western Union wire that is $3500 more than your asking price if you just send me the overpayment back in a money order. |
Subject:
Re: Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
From: myoarin-ga on 26 Dec 2005 16:38 PST |
Hey, Mark, keep it simple: lol, but it detracts from the value of your suggestion - IMHO (being one similarly inclined ;) Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
From: fredsfriend-ga on 27 Dec 2005 05:24 PST |
Thanks for the advice, other than the tongue in cheek comments about my naivity. du u thunk i m stoopid or summthin? lol thanks again, i've got a lawyer on the line as i write this... wish us luck. my then girlfriend is my fiance' now - so hopefully things won't go south... |
Subject:
Re: Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
From: asweetangelseyes-ga on 27 Dec 2005 10:48 PST |
YES YES YES. Get the attorney. THey will let you pay once your case is settled. Dont trust that insurance company. they lowball offer to shut people up and push stuff under the rug. Also, it would be a good idea to leave the file open for a while, (meaning) dont sign off when the attorney tells you they have reached settlement. I made that mistake and still have pain/psych suffering from an accident i had back in 2000 becuase of a erradic taxi cab driver. Your Fiancee could have pain and suffering that lags on or appears long after the sports medicine/therapy people work their magic. This is just my two cents. The lawyer will work to get you as much as he can because of the 1/3 cut thats in it for him. |
Subject:
Re: Hiring a lawyer versus taking the Car Insurance Company's payment?
From: fredsfriend-ga on 27 Dec 2005 11:40 PST |
Thank you asweetangelseyes, I have an appt set up next week. Thanks to all of you who responded. I just had to hear it from others to confirm my own skepticism. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |