Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Incidence of Trichiasis ( No Answer,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Incidence of Trichiasis
Category: Health > Conditions and Diseases
Asked by: nomi-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 03 Sep 2002 03:19 PDT
Expires: 03 Oct 2002 03:19 PDT
Question ID: 61194
Does anyone have reasonable figures for the incidence of Trichiasis?

Request for Question Clarification by blazius-ga on 03 Sep 2002 04:02 PDT
Trichiasis (a misdirection of eyelashes towards the eyeball) has
several causes, and the incidence may vary between different regions
of the world.

It would be helpful if you could supply some more details on the kind
of numbers you seek.

Clarification of Question by nomi-ga on 03 Sep 2002 04:21 PDT
I am looking for the incidence in the U.S.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

The following answer was rejected by the asker (they reposted the question).
Subject: Re: Incidence of Trichiasis
Answered By: blazius-ga on 03 Sep 2002 05:31 PDT
Rated:2 out of 5 stars
 
The short answer to your question is "no".

It does not seem to be any reliable figures on the incidence of
trichiasis in the United States of America.  I have done searches both
on Google and PubMed
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed) for any
mention of such numbers, but most population studies on the condition
have been performed in developing countries.

eMedicine's information page on trichiasis
(http://www.emedicine.com/oph/topic609.htm) states that the exact
incidence of trichiasis in the US is unknown, but mentions that
"simple trichiasis involving only a few lashes is relatively common. 
Diffuse trichiasis involving the entire lid margin is much less
common, and it is seen primarily in countries where trachoma is
endemic."  (Trachoma is a chronic follicular conjunctivitis caused by
Chlamydia trachomatis that leads to scarring in the conjunctiva.)  No
known racial or sexual predilection is evident.

Search strategy:
Different combinations of "trichiasis"/"eyelash inversion",
"incidence"/"frequency" was used on Google and PubMed

Clarification of Answer by blazius-ga on 04 Sep 2002 06:52 PDT
I am sorry that my answer did not satisfy your needs.  If you would
like another Google Answers researcher to try locating the information
you need, I recommend that you apply for a refund (see
https://answers.google.com/answers/faq.html#refund for details).

To avoid further disappointment, you should state clearly which
information you already know, and emphazise the required accurancy of
the answer.
Reason this answer was rejected by nomi-ga:
I was able to find all the information offered here with my own simple
search. My question was not answered to my satisfaction, although
strictly there was a definitive answer.
nomi-ga rated this answer:2 out of 5 stars
I was able to find this information myself with a simple search. I was
looking for something more.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy