Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Five car pile- up on freeway ( Answered,   1 Comment )
Question  
Subject: Five car pile- up on freeway
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: nicki999-ga
List Price: $2.00
Posted: 13 Sep 2002 01:45 PDT
Expires: 13 Oct 2002 01:45 PDT
Question ID: 64578
In a five car pile-up on the freeway who's at fault? The first car to
hit or the last?
Answer  
Subject: Re: Five car pile- up on freeway
Answered By: knowledge_seeker-ga on 13 Sep 2002 08:32 PDT
 
Hi nicki999, 

The general rule in any rear-end collision (which is essentially what
you are talking about) is that the driver of the car BEHIND is the one
at fault. The law dictates that a driver must drive in such a way
(speed, level of alertness) that he/she can stop or avoid anything
that blocks the roadway at any time.  If the car in front stops
immediately then the driver behind is expected to be able to stop in
time to avoid collision.


MULTI-CAR PILEUPS 

“If someone hits you from behind, it is virtually always his or her
fault, regardless of the reason you stopped. A basic rule of the road
requires that you be able to stop safely if a vehicle stops ahead of
you. If you cannot stop, you are not driving as safely as the person
in front of you. Another aspect of a rear end accident claim is that
the car's damage proves how the accident happened. If the other car's
front end and the rear end of your car are both damaged, there is no
doubt you were struck from the rear.

In some situations both you and the car behind you will be stopped
when a third car runs into the car behind you which pushes into the
rear of your car. In that case it is the driver of the third car who
is at fault and against whose liability insurance you would file a
claim.”

://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:wUdiAhf0wPkC:www.californiatrialattorney.net/personal.html+rear+end+collision+fault&hl=en&ie=UTF-8



REAR END COLLISION ---

“Rear End Collision. The operator of a vehicle subject to the Safe
Driver Insurance Plan shall be presumed to be more than 50% at fault
when operating a vehicle which is in collision with the rear section
of another vehicle.”

http://www.state.ma.us/doi/BOA/Boa_sof_on.html


“One of the standards says that the driver behind in a rear-end
collision is presumed to be at fault.”

://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:FI24D3qnOYEC:www.injlaw.com/mv/mv7.html+rear+end+collision+fault&hl=en&ie=UTF-8


“The driver travelling behind should be able to stop in time to avoid
rear-ending the vehicle ahead. The rear vehicle is usually 100%
liable.”

http://www.icbc.com/Claims-Repairs/bi_common_crashes.html


“..the Standard of Fault, "Rear End Collision" presumes that you are
more than 50% at-fault for an accident when operating a vehicle which
is in collision with the rear section of another vehicle.”

http://www.state.ma.us/doi/Consumer/WaysToSave_SDIP.html

“If another party is clearly at fault, such as in the case of a
rear-end collision, you are entitled to submit a claim to their
insurance company”

http://www.keeneautobody.com/accident.htm



EXCEPTIONS

Backing up collision - Almost always, the driver of a car in a
rear-end, backing collision is either at fault or could have prevented
the crash.

http://www.efleetmanager.com/public/safety/backing.cfm


That should answer your question. Of course circumstances may differ
and an attorney should be consulted if you have specific questions
regarding your particular situation.

Thanks for the question,

K~

Search term:  rear end collision fault
Comments  
Subject: Re: Five car pile- up on freeway
From: slawek-ga on 13 Sep 2002 02:05 PDT
 
There are a lot of variables in those type of scenarios.  Why did the
first car crash?  Was it going too fast, and spun out?  Did a tire
blow?

You should always keep enough distance between yourself and the
vehicle you are following to stop in almost any emergency. Common rule
on distance between yourself and the vehicle ahead of you is to leave
1 car length of space for every 10 miles on your speedometer.  So if
you are going 60mph, you should have at least 6 car lengths between
yourself and the vehicle ahead.

If the first vehicle was doing everything right, but lets say a tire
blew in the middle of a foggy night which resulted in other crashing
into you, the first driver might not be at fault. Those who crashed
into the first vehicle could be held reposible if they were going too
fast for the conditions and because of that did not give themselves
enough time to react...

etc etc. :)  There are sooooo many possibilities, and different
outcomes (not to mention that identical two cases could have different
outcomes depending on the representation of each party), so I am just
droping a comment which might be helpful. :)

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy