![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Study on value of worst team member/employee
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: ronburk-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
18 Sep 2002 10:20 PDT
Expires: 18 Oct 2002 10:20 PDT Question ID: 66469 |
I am trying to locate a study (or correct citation for same) that I heard about third-hand about a couple of years ago. The gist of this study was that getting rid of the worst performer on a team might actually hurt the team performance rather than help; the worst performer provides some intangible benefits, such as making others feel better about themselves by comparison. This is all the information I have, which is why it's a difficult search problem. I heard about the study more than a year ago, I believe, but I have no clue what the actual date of the study was. |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 Sep 2002 11:54 PDT |
I have not been able to find a study on this interesting topic, but it reminds me of the old saying "No man is completely worthless; he can always serve as a bad example." Back in the 1980s, Forbes magazine published an article on this subject that I believe was entitled "Strengthened by the Weakest Link." Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the article online. |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: ronburk-ga on 18 Sep 2002 13:12 PDT |
> I have not been able to find the article online Even an incomplete citation is fine, if I can get the article (offline even) and verify it's the one (I've been looking for this a long time). Any clues that might narrow it down before I hunch over 10 years of microfiched Forbes? I couldn't find any online issue index for Forbes, nor could I find any online references to this article title (of course, if it was 1980's, that's to be expected). Was this title just pulled from memory, or did you have a more specific reference that might provide other clues? |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 Sep 2002 13:18 PDT |
The article that I mentioned seeing in Forbes was indeed "pulled from memory." I believe I read the article in 1985 or 1986, but have no further information beyond my recollection of the title. Although I used to have a mind like a steel trap, it is increasingly resembling a steel sieve these days. The title "Strengthened by the Weakest Link" stayed with me, but other details, unfortunately, did not. |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: ronburk-ga on 18 Sep 2002 13:52 PDT |
Excellent! I will trundle on down to the nearest mortar-and-bricks Google (library) and see if I can micro-fish it out :-). I assume you are a "Researcher"? If so, and if I find the sought-for article, I will let you know so that you can post it as an "Answer" and we can complete the transaction. Either way, thanks for your help, as I have come upon no new clues in my search for this piece in quite a long time! |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 Sep 2002 14:13 PDT |
I am indeed a "Researcher." Since my memory of the article is so vague and unsupported, I decided to post it as a freebie "Comment" rather than as an inadequate $20 "Answer." I hope your micro-fishing expedition helps you to locate the article. Wish I could remember more, but, like many folks my age, I am battling a case of Hardening of the Smarteries. ~pinkfreud |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: guillermo-ga on 18 Sep 2002 18:17 PDT |
This wont help you find that quote, but may add some extra knowledge in a similar sense. According to certain schools in social psychology, a person would not be the worst performer in a group just by h. own merits, but also because the other members of the group assign h., subconsciously, that role, in order to keep their own weaknesses comfortably away. Get rid of that person, and sooner than later someone else would take that place. In the meantime, some anxiety would be generated by the fear of am I gonna be the looser, once the looser is gone? All this would have a negative impact in a teams effectiveness. From this point of view, the most recommendable way to handle it by the leader, is to help every one to be aware of their own good and bad aspects, try to improve the good ones, encourage cooperation, and avoid fixed roles as the best and the worst. |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: guillermo-ga on 18 Sep 2002 18:20 PDT |
Typo: loser. |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: ronburk-ga on 18 Sep 2002 18:22 PDT |
The library computers came back up and I was able to do a database search instead of the hard way. Alas, searches on Forbes from 1980 to present came up empty. I also tried a variety of more general searches (portions of the title, full-text instead of title only, etc.) and still came up blank. The title sounds compelling however, so it's very tantalizing. Any other publications you deem a possibility for having read this title in? This is starting to feel like a really boring episode of X-files :-). I know that sucker is out there somewhere! |
| Subject:
Re: Study on value of worst team member/employee
From: ronburk-ga on 18 Sep 2002 18:35 PDT |
Hi guillermo-ga (why are all you people from Georgia? :-), Thanks for the note; I'm aware mostly of the work of Belbin in the area of roles and teams, but haven't been able to find the exact thing I'm looking for in his work (so far). The person I heard about this study from worked as a programmer at H-P at the time, so I figured this was (at the time, anyway) a fairly widely circulated study/article, something to generate a lot of watercooler discussion in businesses. A chapter in a book I'm writing is about the psychology of competence, and I just *know* that after it's published, people will come out of the woodwork and ask me how I could have overlooked this thing that I can't even find; that's my obsession with this particular citation, though I am interested in the psychology of (in)competence in general. Thanks again for the note! |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |