Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: gun control ( Answered,   1 Comment )
Question  
Subject: gun control
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: sfwendy-ga
List Price: $50.00
Posted: 23 Sep 2002 10:40 PDT
Expires: 23 Oct 2002 10:40 PDT
Question ID: 68108
Help! I offhandedly announced I would use "gun control" to illustrate
how important policy issues can generate opposing, but equally strong
arguments. I forgot how many biased sources are available.

I will gladly pay $50 to receive:

	6 accessible, citeable unbiased articles/papers/studies by recognized
experts containing "in favor" arguments for students to look up and

	6 accessible, citeable unbiased articles/papers/studies by recognized
experts containing "against" arguments

The same article may contain an examination of both sides, and for
payment purposes will be counted as 1.5 of the 10.

No more than one statistical argument, preferably one that can be used
EITHER way and it must be no more than 2 (two) years old.

Request for Question Clarification by pinkfreud-ga on 23 Sep 2002 11:29 PDT
Do you consider an article biased if it espouses one side of this
issue over the other? It's difficult to find totally neutral
discussions of a hot-button topic such as gun gontrol.

Request for Question Clarification by mwalcoff-ga on 23 Sep 2002 11:33 PDT
I am a bit confused. You want "unbiased" sources, but you want them to
be on one side of the issue or the other. By "unbiased," do you mean
empirical, peer-reviewed scientific literature?

Clarification of Question by sfwendy-ga on 23 Sep 2002 12:25 PDT
By unbiased, I meant to say, "no frothing-at-the-mouth unreasoned
idiots" can be used. I am hoping to get sources that, while they may
take a clear stance one way or the other, are well-versed in the
field/topic.

Completely neutral analyses, are, I agree, impossible to find.

Total pro, total con articles are great, as long as they are clear and
well-reasoned. The whole idea of the exercise is to demonstrate that
important policy issues generate valid, defensible positions on both
sides. I want to explode the black/white thinking that so many bring
to an important issue. An article examining both sides can take a pro-
or anti- stance in its conclusion.

If you find empirical, peer-reviewed scientific literature I would be
thrilled beyond belief.

Thanks for taking an interest in my leaky boat.
Answer  
Subject: Re: gun control
Answered By: ericynot-ga on 23 Sep 2002 17:27 PDT
 
Hi Sfwendy,

I recently got into an extended email debate with a stranger at a
pro-gun website and had to do some digging to buttress my own beliefs.
I also read a lot of material from the opposite point of view, so I'm
going to take a crack at your question.

You're correct in saying that the sources in this debate tend to be
one-sided and "frothing at the mouth", but there are plenty of
statistics available to help people argue both sides of the issue.
Let's start with the pro-gun position. Here are some references to
look at:

References with a generally PRO-GUN bias ---

1) an article by Robert J. Woolley, MD arguing that the AMA's position
with regard to firearms is intellectually dishonest:
Http://www.dsgl.org/Articles/woolley.htm

2) an article by Gene R. Flick, MD taking issue with the gun control
position of the American Psychiatric Association:
 http://www.dsgl.org/Articles/flick2.htm

3)  rebuttal of statistics cited below in Reference (1) of the
Anti-Gun section with regard to gun violence in Alberta, Canada. This
article is by M.J. Ackerman, MD:
http://www.dsgl.org/Articles/Ackermann.htm

4) arguments that gun shows do not constitute the danger many people
believe by David Kopel, columnist for various publications including
the Colorado Springs Gazette, and associate policy analyst at the Cato
Institute (also co-author of reference (7) below):
http://keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=1454

5) in-depth study of the Second Amendment as a guarantee of broad
individual rights to own firearms by Randy E. Barnett, Boston
University Professor of Law:
http://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/texts.htm

6) an essay considering the racist origins of gun control laws by
historian Clayton E. Cramer which was originally published in the
Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy (this is an angle little
considered elsewhere):
http://www.law.ukans.edu/jrnl/cramer.htm

7) an extensive study of positive effects associated with concealed
handgun permit laws written by Clayton Cramer and David Kopel,
Research Director of the Independence Institute, a Colorado think
tank:
http://www.claytoncramer.com/shall-issue.html

8) summary statistics by various academic writers concerning the
successful defensive use of guns (with several useful links):
http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcdgeff.html

References with a generally ANTI-GUN bias ---

1) Facts supporting the statistical linkage of guns to violence in
Alberta, Canada (see Article 3 above for rebuttal of these numbers):
http://www.med.ualberta.ca/acicr/

2) excellent summary of the reasons for banning handguns by the
Violence Policy Center, a group that is sort of the mirror image of
the NRA, and which has extensive study and position papers available:
http://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/hgbanfs.htm

3) an extensive study by the Violence Policy Center of murder-suicide
incidents in the United States:
http://www.vpc.org/studies/amercont.htm

4) the position of the AMA with regard to gun violence as described on
the AMA website:
http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_00/hlsb0710.htm

5) a symposium on the history and interpretation of the Second
Amendment, presented by The Center to Prevent Handgun Violence:
http://www.gunlawsuits.org/defend/second/symposium/symposium.asp

6) key facts regarding firearms violence as compiled by the Violence
Policy Center:
http://www.vpc.org/studies/wher2gen.htm

7) a compelling discussion of why firearms are a dangerous choice for
self defense, with extensive (219) references:
http://www.vpc.org/studies/unincont.htm

8) a report from the Brady site describing corporate gun sale
strategies, and how those strategies ensure that many guns will be
diverted to the criminal market:
http://www.gunlawsuits.org/reform/distribution.asp

Reference with a NEUTRAL bias ---

1) from James D. Wright writing for the National Institute of Justice
comes "The Armed Criminal in America", a summary article that
discusses how criminals acquire and use firearms. This article might
be used to buttress either side of the gun control argument.
http://rkba.org/research/wright/armed-criminal.summary.html

For reasons of time and brevity, I have not attempted to write a
review each of the above citations. I hope that, upon study, you will
find them worthy of fueling both sides of your debate. I have tried to
select references that would come at the gun control controversy from
as many directions as possible, but if you feel any significant point
of contention has been omitted, please let me know, and I'll try to
find more specifics for you.

Google Searches Used:

gun control debate statistics
firearm self defense debate
Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz
AMA gun control position

Regards,
ericynot-ga

Request for Answer Clarification by sfwendy-ga on 24 Sep 2002 11:42 PDT
Hello,

Thanks for taking a look around on my behalf. However, while I am
unable to find the article http://www.dsgl.org/Articles/Ackermann.htm,
I cannot find the corresponding original "Firearms FACTS" at the
http://www.med.ualberta.ca/acicr/ site. Can you be more specific with
the link?

thank you!

sfwendy

Clarification of Answer by ericynot-ga on 24 Sep 2002 15:33 PDT
Sfwendy, 
 
My apologies for the abbreviated link. Here is the complete link to
the Firearm Facts from the Alberta Centre for Injury Control and
Research: http://www.med.ualberta.ca/acicr/pages/facts/gunfact.html
 
ericynot-ga
Comments  
Subject: Re: gun control
From: pinkfreud-ga on 23 Sep 2002 15:20 PDT
 
Some of this material might be useful. Note the links and "further
reading" at the bottom of the page.

http://www.debatabase.org/details.asp?topicID=33

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy