Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Gravitational Forces ( Answered,   3 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Gravitational Forces
Category: Science > Physics
Asked by: kc1013-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 25 Sep 2002 22:44 PDT
Expires: 25 Oct 2002 22:44 PDT
Question ID: 69228
Given a substance of fixed density and volume, what shape
maximizes the gravitational force at a given surface point? How much
better does it do than a sphere?
[The story: The planet Shmoo is a live planet. It has the same average
density as Earth, and its surface is indistinguishable from that of
Earth. Astronaut Arthur lands on Shmoo, and is inclined to think that
he has landed on Earth. However Shmoo is a friendly planet, and would
like to rescue Arthur from his erroneous impression, by giving him the
biggest gravitational hug he can. Shmoo has uniform density, which he
cannot change, but he can change his shape. How should he do it? How
big is best hug?]
Answer  
Subject: Re: Gravitational Forces
Answered By: calebu2-ga on 26 Sep 2002 11:25 PDT
 
kc1013,

You got me sucked in on this one. (Attracted to the gravity of the
question!). It's been a while since I studied gravitational mechanics,
so my hopes of answering your question directly were pretty slim.

However one of the main reasons Google has researchers is not because
of their immense knowledge (otherwise I would be in trouble) but
because of their ability to leverage the web and find the answer you
are looking for. And on that approach I was able to find a nice PDF
document that walks you through all of the steps to answer the
question.

So, short answer - go to the following link and read :

quiz.thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de/02/A0202_KMD.pdf

(Looks to me like the answer is "an egg" whose equation is given by
the rotation of the graph z/(x^2 + z^2)^(3/2) = 2*5^(1/3)*a)

From what I can tell, the analysis seems correct (again it's been a
couple of months since I did calculus of variations, but that would
make sense as the best approach to take on the question). It's not
surprising that the solution is cylindrically symmetrical, since any
mass would be better moved closer to the axis of action than applied
in a lopsided manner.

My main goal now should be to explain how I went about the search so
that you can find this kind of thing yourself.

My first approach (which turned out to be too direct) was do do a
search for what I thought the answer would be :

Google Search : "gravitational pull" "hollow sphere"

Unfortunately, the results produced by this search told me that I was
in fact 180 degrees off the correct answer (A hollow sphere has a zero
force inside of it - a fact that I would have known had I paid more
attention to Mr. I. Newton)

After realizing that this was not the correct answer, I did several
other fruitless searches before taking the more direct approach of
finding a general discussion of the problem :

Google Search : maximize "gravitational force" shape

As luck would have it, the above answer showed up as the first item
(so I could have clicked the "I'm feeling lucky" button if I wanted :)

So, make good use of the key terms in the problem; use quotation marks
around the key terms; and be prepared to learn from your erroneous
searches (Now if you get asked what shape Shmoo should be to minimize
the force, the answer would be to envelop the astronaut in a hollow
sphere (Like the astronaut wouldn't get the hint at that point :))

Anyway, I hope this helps (It's quite a technical answer, my apologies
- but to "prove" something like this (rather than give a reasonable
guess) is often quite messy).

Regards and happy shapeshifting!

calebu2-ga
Comments  
Subject: Re: Gravitational Forces
From: davidmaymudes-ga on 26 Sep 2002 01:21 PDT
 
I'm pretty sure a sphere is best; any other shape moves the mass
farther away from the point in question.  I can't think of a clever
way to prove it, though.
Subject: Re: Gravitational Forces
From: michael2-ga on 26 Sep 2002 01:23 PDT
 
I assume that 'fixed' should read 'uniform'?
Subject: Re: Gravitational Forces
From: rbnn-ga on 26 Sep 2002 16:34 PDT
 
michael2-ga: regarding your comment 

      "I assume that 'fixed' should read 'uniform'"

Your hypothesis is incorrect. 64257 is the character code for the fi
ligature. ( http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/latin1.html )
 
The intended meaning was thus "fixed" and not "uniform".

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy