Hi
The possible causes of homosexuality have been divided into biological
essentialist theory, namely, that homosexuality is genetically
induced, and social constructionist theory, a belief that
homosexuality is environmentally induced A third and more prominent
theory, the interactive theory, views sexual orientation as being
produced by a mixture of complementary genetic and learned influences.
Much research has been conducted on the biological basis of
homosexuality with interests ranging from brain differences to genetic
linkage studies.
The justification for research into structural brain differences
associated with sexual orientation has mainly come from rat studies.
Several regions in the rat hypothalamus are sexually dimorphic-ie they
are larger and contain more cells in one sex than another. The sexual
dimphorism of these structures suggest that these brain structures
have a major role in sexual and reproductive functions between the
sexes. Lesioning of the nucleus within the hypothalamus in male rats
has been reported to produce lordosis (a condition that causes the
back to arch) and to affect libido. The rats with this condition
allowed themselves to be mounted, which is interpreted as rodent
homosexual behaviour.
Recent brain research has found structural brain differences in the
hypothalamus in relation to biological sex and sexual orientation in
humans. Differences in size and cell number of various nuclei in the
hypothalamus for homosexual versus heterosexual men have been
reported.
The research mentioned above has resulted in excitement as well as
skepticism and has not been verified as of yet. It concludes that
limitations of the data and different scientists different
interpretation of the data suggests that we need replicated and
extended findings before a link between brain differences and
homosexuality can be made.
Many studies have taken place on the environment in which homosexuals
are brough up. These have shown that predominately homosexual men
had brothers of whom 22 percent were also homosexual. In contrast,
only 4 percent of the brothers of heterosexual men were homosexual,
which is about the population average of homosexuality.
In December of 1991, Michael Bailey of Northwestern University and
Richard Pillard of the Boston University School of Medicine published
a study of homosexuality in twins. They surveyed homosexual men about
their brothers, and they found that of the homosexuals who had
identical twin brothers, 52 percent of those twins were also
homosexual. 22 percent of those who had fraternal twins said that
their twin was gay, and only eleven percent of those who had adopted
siblings said that their adopted brothers were also homosexual.
Bailey and Pillard attributed the differences in these percentages to
the difference in the amount of genetic material shared. Since
identical twins have the same genetic code, they are far more likely
to share sexual orientation than fraternal twins. In other words, they
were born homosexual.
(A frequent objection is these studies is that parents treat identical
twins more similarity and this similar treatment could explain
similarities in behaviour, rather than the twins similar genotype.
Also, these studies are frequently run by advertising for volunteers.
It is thought that gay men whose twins are also gay would be more
willing to volunteer than gay men with heterosexual twins.)
Other studies have shown that highest rate of homosexual orientation
was in brothers, who had a 13.5 percent chance of being gay. Analyses
also showed an excess of gay uncles and male first cousins on the
maternal side compared to the paternal side. It has been suggested
that this shows there is an X-linked (female) gene influence on male
sexual orientation.
One study selected 40 pairs of homosexual brothers in whose lineage
they could identify at least one maternal homosexual relative. They
obtained blood samples from the brothers and from the other family
members. The DNA samples were typed for 22 genetic markers spanning
the length of the X-chromosome. 5 "marker" genes on the X-chromosome
were similar for 33 of the 40 pairs of brothers. This was
statistically different from the expected rate, suggesting that a gene
influencing male homosexuality. This result has only been seen once,
and more studies will be needed before it becomes anything close to
proven.
All of the above work has sought to prove a genetic link to male
homosexuality, but none as yet has achieved scientific validity.
Researchers around the world are currently trying to reproduce the
findings, and it may be that, in time, a genetic correlation will be
found.
P-FLAG ("Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays") offers a booklet
on the biological research into the origins of homosexuality.
This pamphlet says:
"To date, no researcher has claimed that genes can determine sexual
orientation. At best, researchers believe that there may be a genetic
component. No human behavior, let alone sexual behavior, has been
connected to genetic markers to date...sexuality, like every other
behavior, is undoubtedly influenced by both biological and societal
factors."
The best overall summary of most respected researchers is that
homosexuality (like most other psychological conditions) is due to a
combination of social, biological, and psychological factors. Most
researchers are in agreement that demonstrating that any behavioral
state, let alone one so complex, and diverse in its manifestations, as
homosexuality, is not only biological, but genetic is well beyond our
present research capacity
For a full rundown on all the biological research read the following
A scientific paper on the Biology of human homosexuality
www.rdc.ab.ca/scottpsych/website/student/ psych_375_sample_paper.rtf
A fine article on the history of scientific research into
homosexuality
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/97jun/burr2.htm
On the Origins of Homosexuality
www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/homorig.html
Search Strategy
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Homosexuality+Environment+Biology&btnG=Google+Search |