So, are there any economic theories comparing the US and RUSSIA
visavis capitalism vs communism and presuming that after X (squared?
because of instant start w/automatic-corruption pre-built in?)
percentage amount of time (as a function of comparative metric between
factors like population, relative GDP, etc) from the inception of the
governments, they are both EQUIVOCALLY CORRUPT WITH ONE ANOTHER AND
ALSO FUNCTION IN EXACTLY THE SAME MANNERS ON ALL LEVELS (down to...

 (beautifully, any error due to inaccuracy or veracity of any
accounting records would be mitigated -completely- by the fact that
the same things apply to the other country in the same exact ratio
over time)

 maybe a funny corollary which attempts to plot the estimated years
left (based on data we can collect and plot from the rise and fall of
the soviet union)

 ...a graph which plots how much time before another revolution is due in
-any- country in the world for which complete enough financial records
are accessible.   ("the coup-coup clock - or, better - the nuclear bus
schedule")  this would of course be a (margin of error) difference in
accuracy between countries in different metagroups based on
size/pop/land/gdp/time etc..)  anyway:

all based on data we can collect and plot from that easily available
today regarding both huge living statistical model countries, US/USSR.
(imperative that we get hold of what we can of what's left in USSR of
this data so we can make our models more accurate)

---  any comedy books on:

philosophical difference:  the true origin of war

   socialism = ideal

     /                \


capitalism   =    communism

( in a "directional kant" of:  synthesis OVER thesis/anti-thesis  )

this is a theory that i think can -probably- be fitted to a
"statistical model of truth" based on *factual* accounting records. 
(where's the research on THAT? too, if it exists - what a read) and
found to be a true theory itself -  a self-validating recursive? no!
worse! "loop theory"?  the marginoferror function?

"most theories on historical matters just have to be self consistent
in language" - and this theory can prove that that theory is TRUE OR
NOT.  it opens up a whole meta class of theory!...  or maybe not.

!

-todd