I need to give a little background information before asking this
question. Last Saturday night I was in a restaurant (to be called,
Restaurant) at about 2 or 3 am, with a group of friends. We all asked
for the bill to be split. Everyone had left, and me and my friend
walked up to pay our portion of the bill. After we did, we were told
there was still a balance on the bill. Assuming one of our friends
stiffed us, we said that this was not our problem, and proceeded to
leave.
We normally go to Restaurant every Saturday night. We also see the
same group of "Security Guards" at a table. About 8 or 10 of them.
While their shirts and decorations say security, they carry holstered
handguns.
As we are outside about to get into our car and leave, all of the
security men come out, telling us that we must go back inside, and pay
the rest of the bill. These men are not employed by Restaurant.
This happened in the state of New York, in Monroe county.
Now, follows my question. This question has two parts.
Part I.
I am trying to understand exactly what "kind" of security guards these
men were. They carried guns. I have never seen security personnel
with guns before. I would like to know what kind of legal power a
"security" person has over a regular citizen. Furthermore, I would
like to know if they were legally allowed to harass us about the bill,
even though they were not employed by the restaurant. They never
identified themselves as police officers, yet they administered
themselves in much the same way. I understand that, perhaps, they may
have been police officers, but simply wearing "security" uniforms. I
do not believe that that was the case. I need to understand, and have
answered, what legal power "security guards" such as these may posess.
Part II.
They carried holstered handguns. They were not concealed. I would
like to know the laws for this, and what status a person must have in
order to carry a holstered weapon in public. I have already come
across www.packing.org and I found it mostly unhelpful, since it only
describes laws for carrying a concealed weapon. I would like to know
the laws in NYS about carrying an unconcealed weapon, as these
security men were. |
Clarification of Question by
vcardillo-ga
on
14 Mar 2006 09:15 PST
Regarding Harassment:
I said that they "harassed" us. This may be too harsh a term, but I
will summarize the events, and allow you to interpret.
About eight of them came outside into the restaurant parking lot, and
kept us from getting into our car. They did so by swarming around us,
continually telling us we had to go back in and pay, and surrounding
the car. But, they never touched us. Furthermore, once the issue was
resolved and the remainder of the bill was paid, they continued to
stand outside, laugh at the situation, and verbally harass us. The
other person I was with was deaf, and they were making comments and
jokes as to that effect.
|
Request for Question Clarification by
tutuzdad-ga
on
14 Mar 2006 10:54 PST
Regardless of who these "security guards" were, you maintain that you
were not guilty of any crime and not liable for any bill. This is not
the wild west and a gang of armed men cannot simply show up and abuse
their authority (assuming they had any to begin with) without
investigating your side of the story. With that said, you may have a
viable claim of false imprisonment for which you should certainly
consult an attorney. False imprisonment is the restraint of a person?s
liberty of movement by another party who lacks the legal authority OR
JUSTIFICATION to do so.
"False imprisonment involves the total physical confinement of a
person against their will for a significant period of time (however
short). The use of physical contact or force is not necessary for a
situation to be considered false imprisonment. Any threat or use of
authority, which confines another person against their will without
the authority to do so, is considered false imprisonment. False
imprisonment must confine a person to physical or intangible
boundaries, such as a room, their current physical space, or even a
larger area like a city or state. To be considered false
imprisonment, a person must lack a reasonable means to safely escape
the confinement."
"The remedy for false imprisonment is the restoration of the victim?s
liberty and the recovery of damages from the party responsible in a
civil case. In some circumstances, criminal charges may also be
brought against the party responsible for the false imprisonment."
CRIMINAL LAW SOURCE
http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/terms/false-imprisonment.html
You might consider contacting an attorney in your area who can
evaluate your case and who might be able to summon the restaraunt
owner to court to have him answer as to why these men, acting as his
agents, pursued you unlawfully and detained you against your will in
an effort to intimidate you into paying a bill you were not liable
for.
http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/criminal_law/new_york.html
It may also be interesting to know if these men were getting their
meals for half-price - as armed law enforcement and security guards
often do in local restaraunts. It sounds trivial but the truth is that
some businesses offer meals to armed personnel at a discount rate so
they will frequent the business and provide free protection. The
premise here is that it is a courtesy to men and women who serve the
public but all too often the real intent is to have them on hand so
they can "police" the place if need arises. This, in turn, often makes
the guards biased and they are willing to do whatever a business owner
asks them to do without question. It isn't right, but it does happen -
I know it for a fact, because I've been in law enforcement all my
life.
Let's assume the business owner asked the men to collect his bill, or
at the very least, had knowledge that they were going to do so on
their own but did nothing to protect you by preventing them from
taking that action. In my opinion, having 8 or 10 unidentified armed
men publicly confront a patron and his handicapped friend over an
unpaid dinner bill they did not owe is, without question, extreme
overkill and I think you might handily win a civil suit or a
settlement against the business owner if you were to pursue it.
Let me know if this solution sufficiently answers your question.
tutuzdad-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
vcardillo-ga
on
14 Mar 2006 22:38 PST
tutuzdad-ga,
Yes, it helps greatly with the first part.
The only thing I have not been able to figure out, is about the 2nd
part. I have gotten mixed answers as to whether or not they can
legally carry open fireams in public. What kind of license is
necessary for this? Is it possible that they are pellet guns, or not
actually handguns?
|
Request for Question Clarification by
tutuzdad-ga
on
15 Mar 2006 06:56 PST
In the State of New York the Security Guard Act 1992 mandates the
training and licensing of all security personnel. Section 2.30 of the
New York State Criminal Procedure Law defines the training
requirements for peace officers. Section 209-q of the New York State
General Municipal Law defines the training requirements for police
officers. You can find out about all these requirements and
regulations from the New York State Division of Criminal Justice
Services:
http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/index.htm
In particular, the New York Department of State Division of Licensing
Services handles all the licensing of security guards in that state.
You can reach them by phone at (518) 474-4429, by fax at (518)
473-6648, or by email at licensing@dos.state.ny.us
In addition, any one of these approve security guard training
facilities can answer any questions you may have about the arming of
security guards:
http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/ops/docs/sgtraining/pubs/sgpapprovedschls.pdf
It is highly unlikley that a security guard would openly carry a "BB
gun" or some other form of a "look-alike" weapon. Guards are either
armed or unarmed - period.
As I said, probably your best bet is to pursue the owner of the
business to get your best answers since these men appeared to act as
his "agents" but you should probably do this through a lawyer or by
way of a formal complaint through the Department of State to avoid
being seen as a disgruntled and harassing patron.
Please let me know if this suffices as an answer.
Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
vcardillo-ga
on
15 Mar 2006 09:04 PST
tutuzdad,
Your replies, and hagan's replies, were extremely helpful. I agree
that both of your replies, and his final comment, should be part of
the final answer. I appreciate all of this help greatly. Thanks very
much guys. Do you see my price of $10 as reasonable for your help?
|
Request for Question Clarification by
tutuzdad-ga
on
15 Mar 2006 09:14 PST
I'd like to extend my thanks to hagan-ga for the additional
iinformation. Would it be acceptable to you if I merely close the
question officially and call it a day rather than try to condense what
we have discussed into a formal answer? If so, your current fee is
reasonable in my opinion.
Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
vcardillo-ga
on
15 Mar 2006 09:43 PST
Sure, that is fine. Thanks very much for your speedy and accurate replies!
|