Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Semiconductor electronics ( No Answer,   5 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Semiconductor electronics
Category: Science
Asked by: iceman95129-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 17 Mar 2006 13:12 PST
Expires: 16 Apr 2006 14:12 PDT
Question ID: 708515
What are the most disruptive technologies in the year 2016?

Request for Question Clarification by vik-ga on 08 Apr 2006 23:26 PDT
It is likely that there will be a range of technologies that will
enable consumers to fabricate their own hardware in a way that can
compete directly with commercial offerings. Is this the type of
disruption you are looking for, or did you have something else in
mind?
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Semiconductor electronics
From: daemon_byte-ga on 20 Mar 2006 05:32 PST
 
you do know you states that in past tense despite the fact there is
another 10 years to go before that year happens.
Subject: Re: Semiconductor electronics
From: williamashley-ga on 22 Mar 2006 02:05 PST
 
My Original Answer
what do you mean by disruptive?

protesters. it is always protesters..


humsn beings gain predominance as the global mind is launched.

Finally, factories are switched over to 0 emissions as polar icecaps
reach 'danger' areas.

The looming threat of a pole reversal does not abate.


My revised answer

NONE.. cause I will be in paradise....
Subject: Re: Semiconductor electronics
From: nayanga-ga on 27 Mar 2006 04:11 PST
 
It is Nano Technology
It is Nano Technology
It is Nano Technology
It is Nano Technology
Subject: Re: Semiconductor electronics
From: nayanga-ga on 27 Mar 2006 04:15 PST
 
http://it.jeita.or.jp/eltech/IWFIPT/pdf/5-3cavin.pdf
Subject: Re: Semiconductor electronics
From: david0000-ga on 02 Apr 2006 17:09 PDT
 
That's an easy question. It will be the heterointegration of III-V
compound semiconductors with silicon. This is not done today because
the gate oxides available for compound semiconductors today are
inferior to the silicon dioxide and related dielectrics readily
available on silicon. Oxides for silicon become too leaky (due to
being so few monolayers that tunneling is excessive) at the end of the
SIA roadmap in 2013, so there's a need to cut over coon after that.
The motivation is speed: Some of these compound semiconductors are
forty times faster than silicon!

As for the giga-nonsense about nano, nanoscale transistors were
described in 1999. Seven years later, the fastest is a whopping 40
MHz. Big whoop.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy