View Question
Q: speed of light, why not? ( Answered,   3 Comments )
 Question
 Subject: speed of light, why not? Category: Science > Physics Asked by: chefmarius-ga List Price: \$10.00 Posted: 17 Mar 2006 13:59 PST Expires: 16 Apr 2006 14:59 PDT Question ID: 708533
 ```I'm no scientist, but what I would like to know is this. As far as I know Einstein "proved" that u cannot reach the speed of light, u can only approach it,I think its "c" now, speed of light equels 300 x 10 to the power of 6. why cant we go faster than that, why is it IMPOSSIBLE? Is it not just technology that is keeping us back? I know that they say we will be as flat as you can possibly get it, but if you accelerate slowly and eventually pick up the speed, and combined with depresserization, we will be okay? but appart from that, what is physically keeping us from going past 299 792 458m.s? Technology? I think so!! pls explaine why not!!```
 Subject: Re: speed of light, why not? Answered By: hedgie-ga on 17 Mar 2006 20:40 PST
 ```Marius, This is a 'Frequently Asked Question', and also 'Frequentl Miss-answered Question' and there is a reason for that: Before we can ask 'why is it?' we have to understand 'what it is'. Speed of light is not as simple as let's say speed of car on a freeway, People tried for a centuries to measure it, and then few more centuries to understand the results. Here is a brief outline of that history and an one instrument which can measure it. http://saeta.physics.hmc.edu/Courses/p23a/Experiments/Light.html There is more on the history bellow, under heading "Phase and Group Velocity". In the vacuum (in the outer space) these two velocities are same, so let's for now take this more simple case of speed in the vacuum: It is not problem of technology. The analogy with the 'sound barrier' which was proposed here http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=605720 does not apply. The limit on the speed of light comes from geometry. It is a bit like saying 'you cannot make a triangle where 'sum of angles' is more than 180 degrees. And you say 'why not?' and take a piece of paper and draw different triangles and (within the precision of measurements) it always adds to 180 degrees. Then you study a bit more about geometry, your will even understand why it is so. Then you may study even more geometry, you find it does not have to be so: You draw a triangle on a sphere (a globe) and it will have more then 180 degrees (e.g. two points on equator and one at the pole). That because the surface of the sphere is curved, and the usual 'plane geometry' does not apply too well. If the curvature is small, like surface of the Earth has, then plane geometry can be used in most cases. Similarly, when speed of the objects in some experiment is relatively small (compared to the c) then 'usual geometry' (we call it E3 = Euclidean three dimensional) can be used. When high speeds are involved, another geometry (M4 = Minkowski space-time) is can help to understanding the results. The limit on the speed of light is a result of the way we apply this geometry to the experimental results (so called 'interpretation of the theory'). Because people ignore this simple fact, fact that some measurements, some statements only make sense within within that geometry M4, we often read, even hear, lot of nonsense like : You would become flat, and overweight, and time will slow to a crawl ... if you would try to move at such a high speed. That is a nonsense. In fact, I am moving near to the speed of light right now, and I am too flat. So are you, moving at very high speed. Whole planet Earth is moving at near speed of light relative to some quasars.You can see their pictures here: http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&q=quasar+&spell=1 and read about them here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar The current record Quasar has a redshift, z = 5.5 (that is very close the speed of light). http://cassfos02.ucsd.edu/public/tutorial/Quasars.html They are very far from us, and move away from us very fast. Or, same thing, we are far from them, and we move fast away from them. We are not particularly flat and fat, but may we look so, when observed from a quasar, To 'move at near speed of light' as not a state of a body - like being hot. Velocity is a relative concept, concept which helps to organize and understand the measurementswe can make and signalswe are getting. To understand that, requires to pick up a book on relativity and read it. It is worth it. Some easy books on the topic are recommended here: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=605720 Before we can ask 'why is it?' we have to understand 'what it is'. e.g. "Phase and Group Velocity There are other less well known aspects of light velocity that are absolutely crucial to understanding the significance of these recent faster-than-light experiments. There are actually different types of velocity that reveal themselves depending on which feature of light is being examined" http://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=34 Hope ths helps - rating appreciated. hedgie```
 ```The formula for mass is given by m = m0 / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), where m0= rest mass, v=velocity, and c=speed of light. You can see that as v approaches c, m approaches infinity, so you would require infinite energy to reach the speed of light.```
 ```tachyons predicted by general relstivity goes faster then c but nothing can ever travel AT c (except for photons) (in a vaccum).```
 ```the faster you move the more you weight... and you need more energy to keep moving...at 300000km/s you would just need too much energy (infinite - as kingal said already). At least according to Einstein's Theory of relativity.```