Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Bridge to nowhere ( Answered,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Bridge to nowhere
Category: Reference, Education and News
Asked by: patrice29-ga
List Price: $2.00
Posted: 19 Mar 2006 09:10 PST
Expires: 18 Apr 2006 10:10 PDT
Question ID: 709159
I never really got the details on the story about congress funding a
bridge project, to an island with next to nothing on it. I believe it
was in Alaska.  Then later it was found that friends and family of the
representative owned lots of land on the island. Please provide a link
to this story.

Thanks,
Patrice
Answer  
Subject: Re: Bridge to nowhere
Answered By: denco-ga on 19 Mar 2006 10:52 PST
 
Howdy Oatrice,

The "Bridge to Nowhere" was widely covered, and here are just a few of the
articles that were written on the story that developed over late 2005.

The Washington Post - "For a Senate Foe of Pork Barrel Spending, Two Bridges
Too Far" by Shailagh Murray.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/20/AR2005102001931.html

"Republicans in Congress say they are serious about cutting spending, but
they learned yesterday to keep their hands off the 'Bridge to Nowhere.'

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), a staunch opponent of pork barrel spending, tried
to block $453 million for two Alaska bridges that had been tucked into the
recent highway bill."

The above article references a paper entitled "The Bridge to Nowhere: A
National Embarrassment" by Ronald D. Utt, Ph.D. which can be found on the
Heritage Foundation website.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm889.cfm

"The bridge has become an object of national ridicule and a symbol of the
fiscal irresponsibility of many in Congress toward the money entrusted to
them by the taxpayers."

U.S. News and World Report - "A bridge (Way) too far" by Bret Schulte.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050808/8highway.htm

"The proposed bridge would be nearly as long as the Golden Gate Bridge and
high enough for cruise ships to pass underneath. It's being paid for in part
by $223 million worth of designated funds, so-called earmarks, included in
the $286.4 billion federal highway and mass transit bill getting wrapped up
by Congress last week."

The Gravina Island project got "defunded" in late 2005.  "Alaska 'bridge to
nowhere' funding gets nowhere" by Jennifer A. Dlouhy in the San Francisco
Chronicle covers this aspect of the story.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/17/MNGF5FPI7N1.DTL

"Fiscal conservatives in Congress won a rare victory Wednesday when lawmakers
scuttled plans to spend $230 million to help build 'the bridge to nowhere,' a
span that would lead to an Alaskan island populated by about 50 people."

But, as this Wall Street Journal "OpinionJournal" column points out, the
project might go forward.  It also speaks to the potential of people close to
the sponsors of the project possibly profiting from their relationships.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007930

"Consider the controversy that just the Alaska congressional delegation has
managed to stir up with the intricate web of ties between its earmarks and
various relatives of the members.
...
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, the much-ridiculed earmark was removed from
the transportation bill, although Alaska was allowed to keep the broader pot
of money to spend as it saw fit. Gov. Murkowski promptly decided to build the
bridge anyway, proposing a down payment of $91 million--the most he could
provide under federal-state spending formulas.
...
The Anchorage Daily News reports that Art Nelson, Mr. Young's son-in-law, is
part owner of 60 acres of what he described as 'beautiful property' on land
that will be opened up to development by the bridge."

The San Francisco Chronicle article describes "Mr. Young" as "Rep. Don Young,
R-Alaska, who, as chairman of the House Transportation Committee, has helped
send federal dollars to the bridge."

As noted in the articles cited above, these kinds of "deals" are called "pork
barrel" projects.  Here is the Wikipedia explanation of the phrase.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork_barrel

"Pork barrel, in a literal sense, is a barrel in which pork is kept, but
figuratively is a supply of money; often the source of one's livelihood."

The searches noted below will provide many more articles on the bridge.

If you need any clarification, please feel free to ask.


Search strategy:

Google search on: "pork barrel" bridge Alaska
://www.google.com/search?q=%22pork+barrel%22+bridge+Alaska

Google search on: "Gravina Island" Young friends OR relatives
://www.google.com/search?q=%22Gravina+Island%22+Young+friends+OR+relatives

Looking Forward, denco-ga - Google Answers Researcher

Clarification of Answer by denco-ga on 19 Mar 2006 10:53 PST
Apologies Patrice, on the typographic error on your name in my answer.

Looking Forward, denco-ga - Google Answers Researcher
Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy