|
|
Subject:
Triple play on ADSL bitstream access
Category: Computers > Internet Asked by: tzk-ga List Price: $35.00 |
Posted:
21 Mar 2006 08:18 PST
Expires: 20 Apr 2006 09:18 PDT Question ID: 710045 |
Does it make sense to launch triple play (or double but with data and tv) service on top of bitstream access? From my research it seems that such approach lacks control on quality of services (voice, tv, data) as compared to full local loop unbundling. It seems also that such solution lacks economic sense. Probably because of this, my analysis of situation in Europe shows that such services are launchend only by incumbent operators. But I'm very open to see another point of view or at least one sucess story or some convincing presentation (bitstream should be realised on ATM level). |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Triple play on ADSL bitstream access
From: daemon_byte-ga on 22 Mar 2006 08:05 PST |
currently in the EU tv over the telephone network is only available on selected trials so a full impact will not be seen yet however I can see no reason why its not a good idea. current lines are capable of taking up to 24mb/s depending on distance from the exchange but its expected soon to be 8mb/s internet to everyone. assume you have a 2mb/s line and voice taking some bandwidth as is currently the case this still gives you 6mb/s in which to stream the tv. If you include the 24mb/s then you have even more space. If they upgrade the system to rival the cable companies with their 10mb/s internet and tv and voice that already exist and work well I can see no reason the telecom industry can not do well at it. |
Subject:
Re: Triple play on ADSL bitstream access
From: tzk-ga on 23 Mar 2006 02:20 PST |
the problem is that in bitstream approach you are dependent on incumbent infrastructure (in my case atm). that generates at least three problems: 1. cost - you have to buy bigger stream to serve tv, in normal case (no tv) you will get money back charging customer for ip transit. i'm not sure that you can charge for tv such fee that will compensate buying few megabits just for tv and fraction of it for ip transit. 2. no control - since dslam and atm cloud is not yours you have no control of qos in such network 3. problem partially similiar to previous point. if you for example decide to use multicast, you are sending multiple same streams through incumbent's atm network which may be scaled and tailored for selling ip data (they for example prepared their network for bitstream reselling, but may calculate some high overbooking factors). that's why i think full unbundling, in which you will use your own dslam may be better, especially if you make it layer3 device. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |