![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
patents
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: nimeshg55-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
22 Mar 2006 16:47 PST
Expires: 21 Apr 2006 17:47 PDT Question ID: 710763 |
Patent trolling = A company that purchases a patent, often from a bankrupt firm, and then sues another company by claiming that one of its products infringes on the purchased patent.. (in other words, getting a patent on something without manufacturing it and then waiting for another to come up with the idea and use it in an invention) Question: 1. Doesn't a patent need to be reduced to practice in ordered to be issued (how can someone get a patent on just the idea itself?) |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: patents
From: kottekoe-ga on 22 Mar 2006 21:26 PST |
It is not necessary to actually demonstrate an idea to get a patent on it. In patent parlance, the filing of the patent is considered a "constructive reduction to practice". It is merely necessary that your patent filing be adequate to "teach" someone with ordinary "skill in the art" to build the invention. I would guess that most issued patents are for inventions that have never been reduced to practice in the ordinary sense of the term. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |