I think a great deal about the origin of the universe.  Did it really
begin with a big bang as the scientists say, or might it instead have
been the result of a big sneeze?  I ask because I think sneezes are
more common than bangs and, moreover, that BIG SNEEZES are thus likely
to be more common than BIG BANGS.  What do you think? And why?

Big Bangs are (potentially) much more powerful than Big Sneezes or Big
Coughing Fits so (if we are prepared to believe the 'scientists') then
a Big Bang seems more likely.

However, it's an interesting theory and maybe there was a Big Sneeze
as well as a Big Bang.

The Big Sneeze sure would have spread a lot of Big Germs around and
maybe that was how Fauna and Flora came into being.

It makes sense ... I do know several snotty people and have often
wondered where they come from.

I do hope that you can cope with the Fame and Fortune that will now come your way.

Can I be the first to order a marble bust of the Great Captain Lane?

Maybe it was the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster
(http://www.venganza.org/) that sneezed. This would give us a grand
unified theory of both creation and the origin of life

If it was a big sneeze, the person, thing, entity, etc., which
sneezed, must pretty big.

The sneezer wouldn't necessarily have to be that large, just think of
the butterfly effect.  Perhaps a little man with a little sneeze spun
things into existence.

Of course sometimes my sneezes are much more powerful and body shaking
than I expect and I once even hurt my back during a viscious sneeze,
BE CAREFUL OUT THERE!

Well, if it was a big sneeze, now we have to wait for the coming of
the great white handkerchief.

certain yogic theories suggest that sneezes have much in common with orgasms

perhaps you're on to something!

in fact I think scientists should just call it The Enormous Ecstacy instead

(this is much more romantic, if nothing else)

for further notes, see Question ID: 728871