|
|
Subject:
free trade
Category: Business and Money > Economics Asked by: bavarianauto328-ga List Price: $2.50 |
Posted:
24 Apr 2006 08:24 PDT
Expires: 24 May 2006 08:24 PDT Question ID: 722295 |
Why is free trade good for the US economy? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: free trade
From: frde-ga on 24 Apr 2006 10:47 PDT |
Well now, there is something called 'The Optimum Tariff' - using the normal models it is actually a freak case when 'Free Trade' works However, because one has interest groups, sometimes it is better that a second rate solution is better - because it gets rid of things that would make it rather a lot worse. The simple answer is that it prevents 'exogenous interference' - or even 'endogenous interference' Interference with either might be benign as very few things (like individuals, companies or economies) are immune from Economic Tsunamis. Personally, If I were running the US economy, I would start shutting down 'Free Trade' - you conned the Japs - but the Chinese are very smart. Free Trade is like 'Democracy' - neither exist, but both are ideals. |
Subject:
Re: free trade
From: icecube718-ga on 26 Apr 2006 22:23 PDT |
In my opinion,USA exports High technology product and other product with very high profit most.And other countries can't compare with USA on number,so free trade is good for USA. |
Subject:
Re: free trade
From: frde-ga on 27 Apr 2006 02:15 PDT |
Lord Rootes the chairman of a British car manufacturing company said something similar in the 1960's He said the UK would export technology rather than manufactures. This was the time they sold the designs for the Hillman Imp engine to the Japanese, it was a revolutionary lightweight alumimium design. There is a very good chance that it is the ancestor of current Japanese engines. The UK no longer has an automobile industry, the Chinese bought Rover, the leftover that BMW sold to some spivs after they stripped Land Rover technology, sold the shell to Ford, and kept the Mini (partly because the factory site is very valuable land). In my view, technology is the by product of manufacturing. Stop manufacturing and you lose the edge. |
Subject:
Re: free trade
From: frde-ga on 27 Apr 2006 07:13 PDT |
Smart RealGreens - quite neat. Somehow I smell a rat when people come up with 'Factor Intensities' - something to do with having studied the subject, and knowing that the tutors had no idea of the real world. Ultimately it is down to natural resources 'Ricardo's Rent' - or the cost of labour Marx's 'capital' which I read as machinery, is very portable. I would like to nip down to Highgate Cemetary and dig him up, just to find what he really meant by 'capital' - my guess is that he thought in neo-mercantile (new-mercantile) terms. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |