Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Preliminary Injunctions on Out of State Non-Party Company ( No Answer,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Preliminary Injunctions on Out of State Non-Party Company
Category: Relationships and Society > Law
Asked by: coderoyal-ga
List Price: $20.00
Posted: 14 May 2006 18:50 PDT
Expires: 14 May 2006 19:06 PDT
Question ID: 728833
Hi,

I'd like to bring a lawsuit against a person for violating a Cyber
piracy law in California (Business and Professions Code 17525). I have
not been able to find a lawsuit filed based on this statute online or
in the records of the courts. This is a cybersquatting law, regarding
domain names.

Without going into too much detail, I understand that the Federal Code
have a similar law (15 USC 1125), but also requires registrars to file
a certificate to the court giving the court control over the domain
name, to avoid liability.

The california law does not provide this level of protection. I fear
that if I file the suit, the defendent will simply cancel or dump the
domain name, in an effort to avoid the lawsuit, and to make life
harder for me. I can't get a TRO because I can't prove that the
defendent WILL do this, which I understand is a requirement. (Code of
Civ. Pro. 527 (c) 1)

I'd like to know, to the best of your knowledge, if a court in
California, would be able to issue a Preliminary injunction on
GoDaddy, an Arizona Corporation, to deposit a certificate, or "lock" a
domain name pending action.

Can a court issue preliminary injunctions against an out-of-state
corporation. I do believe GoDaddy falls under jurisdiction because
they do a lot of business there, but does this empower a court to
issue an injunction on them. Or do I need something like a Letter
Rogatory to have an Arizona Court do this?

I'm also not suing Godaddy. I'd just like to ensure that I can protect
the domain name from being dumped after the defendant get's his
summons.

(Note: I'm aware of a UDRP option, but I prefer to have the defendent
pay for the costs of getting the name. I can't file the case in Fed.
Court because the 1129 statute only permits the "owner of the mark". I
have legitimate interests and rights for the domain name and am
running an official site, which I own.)
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy