|
|
Subject:
program by a large company for the homeless.
Category: Business and Money > Employment Asked by: dprk007-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
20 May 2006 14:27 PDT
Expires: 19 Jun 2006 14:27 PDT Question ID: 730779 |
Some time ago I saw a program on the BBC in which Tesco (the large grocery retailer) allowed street /homeless people the opportunity to work at their stores(usually stacking shelves with produce) My questions are: Does Tescos still have this program in place and if yes a brief description of how it works. 3 or 4 other examples of programs by OTHER large comapanies which give street/homeless people the opportunity to work for them as a means to integrating back into society. DPRK007 |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: program by a large company for the homeless.
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 May 2006 14:51 PDT |
This site may be of interest to you: http://www.bitc.org.uk/programmes/programme_directory/business_action_on_homelessness/baoh_sponsors.html |
Subject:
Re: program by a large company for the homeless.
From: dprk007-ga on 20 May 2006 15:04 PDT |
Pink many thanks for your link. To quote M&S's link "Marks & Spencer is the lead placement provider for Ready for Work - a national programme that provides a 2-week unpaid work placement for the homeless - as part of their Work Placement programme Marks & Start." 2 week unpaid work placement program!! I would consider that pure exploitation not a real attempt to help homeless people integrate into society. All the other companies simply contributed to Money to Homeless charities. (For a company as wealthy as Barclays probably a drop in the ocean) At least the program which Tescos offered seemed to be a genuine effort to help street and homeless people. Nevertheless a very interesting link all the same! :-) DPRK007 |
Subject:
Re: program by a large company for the homeless.
From: neilzero-ga on 21 May 2006 07:59 PDT |
I've worked with some borderline homeless in the USA, so I can assure you that the two weeks free is not unreasonable. Most have serious attitude problems, are addicted to substances, plus they need considerable help to make it though the probationary period, so someone is paying, if not the employer. Even for menial tasks, lots of costly supervision is needed to train these people, and some are not trainable in two months. Never mind two weeks. Neil |
Subject:
Re: program by a large company for the homeless.
From: dprk007-ga on 21 May 2006 14:25 PDT |
Neil "I've worked with some borderline homeless in the USA, so I can assure you that the two weeks free is not unreasonable" During my working life, when a company was training me whether formally (company course for example) or informally (someone teling how to do the job) I always remembered been paid (and at a full salary too). Why should I expect any less of a homeless person (who REALLY do need the money) ? Also I am curious Would you be prepared to do a menial job for free? "Most have serious attitude problems, are addicted to substances, plus they need considerable help to make it though the probationary period, so someone is paying, if not the employer." Well of course the employer is going to pay. I am not talking about a small 10 person company trying to establish itself. I am talking about the likes of Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Sears , Macdonalds (and Tescos) whose revenues are of the same order of magnitude as the GDP of Small to Medium size European countries. With this type of resource as well as simply donating charity they can employ some of our more unfortunate members of our society. "Even for menial tasks, lots of costly supervision is needed to train these people, and some are not trainable in two months. Never mind two weeks" You know I was recently talking to a member of London Transport and the training period to teach someone to drive a train (overground or underground) is ONE YEAR. Training period for aa Doctor is SIX years and a Nurse 3 to 4 years. Even IT people need 3 months to one years training to become productive. SO two months would seem to me a very reasonable period. And in the case of someone who was on the street a total win-win situation. If the person makes it through they become a functioning member of society who are able to support themselves. Now I am not saying there is anything EASY about a program like this. Indeed the example I saw for Tescos , the individual who was been trained to stack shelves was having a difficult adjusting to working life (after years of lfe on the streets caused by alcholism). Even if only one in every five people succeed I would consider this program a success. I believe just as Large Companies have the duty NOT to ruin our environment , they also have the duty to employ some of the less fortunate member of society. Retail companies have the type of opportunities where homeless people can make a start (or restart) I also refuse to refer to them as menial jobs. DPRK007 |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |