|
|
Subject:
A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
Category: Computers > Internet Asked by: probonopublico-ga List Price: $25.00 |
Posted:
28 May 2006 01:29 PDT
Expires: 27 Jun 2006 01:29 PDT Question ID: 732992 |
I?ve just received what appeared to be a message from eBay who (purportedly) ?sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages?. As usual, my Spam Filter (McAfee) blocked some pictures ?to help prevent the sender from identifying my computer?. However, it gave me the option to ?Click here to download pictures?. Anticipating that it was a genuine message, I then downloaded the blocked pictures. In fact, it was a spoof: ?Hi, Is the item still available for sale? Let me know because I'm online and I can pay you right now. Thank you, xxxxxxxxxx? I knew immediately because I do not sell anything on ebay. Further checking revealed that the Item # doesn?t exist; and the sender is not a Registered User. Moreover, although the message claimed that ?Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay? my Registered Name was not, in fact, included. I was requested to respond to the message via a ?Respond Now? button but, of course, I haven?t. Naturally, I have reported this to ebay. However, I do not understand why my Spam Filter blocked some pictures ?to help prevent the sender from identifying my computer?. Please explain and also advise whether or not the sender may now be able to identify my computer because I downloaded the pictures. And does it matter anyway? Many thanks! Bryan |
|
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
Answered By: palitoy-ga on 28 May 2006 03:04 PDT Rated: |
Hello Bryan, Thank-you for your question. I have had a few of these emails myself from "eBay" and they are sadly increasing in regularity. Thankfully Gmail (my email spam filter) is rather good at picking scams such as these up due to the enormous number of emails they can scan coming through their system (and the ability of users to report scams such as these). The reasoning behind why someone would send you the email is mainly for three things - to gain control of your eBay account, to gather any private information it can on you and to verify that your email address exists. The first of these reasons is obvious - if a person gains control of your account they can use it for illegal purposes and essentially assume your identity online for whatever purpose they have in mind. For instance, they could use your account to sell illegal wares, to use your reputation to enhance theirs or simply to harvest your contact information (full name, credit card details, address, telephone numbers etc). Verifying your email address is also a profitable business for people to be in - once they have verified an email address they can add you to a mailing list which they can then sell on for money to large corporations. If the spammer was motivated they could also build up several more focussed mailing lists depending on what you have bought/sold through eBay. This is where your spam filter comes to good use and is preventing the seller from identifying your computer. You are aware that it is simple to place links in an email that appear to be from a company but in fact when you click on a link it actually takes you to another site (a phishing attack). A similar thing can be done with images - when you request to see the image you are essentially visiting the website in order to see the image. In the writing of the email the spammer can make the link to the image include and pass on to him various pieces of information about you such as, but not limited to, your computer's IP address (where your computer lives in effect - thus pinpointing where in the world you live) and your email address (because you are reading the email and the spammer has been notified that you are looking at the images he now knows your email address belongs to a real person). Both of these can be valuable pieces of information for market research. Try going to this website and see what information you are giving away for free: http://www.ip2location.com/ In my case, they have identified where I live (within 10 miles) and who I get my internet connection from. If a spammer (or a sales person) had the time and inclination, he could then use this information to sell me alternative internet service providers in my area. If I had clicked on the links in the email he may also have access to my exact home address and telephone numbers. Viruses and malicious code can also be hidden within certain types of image files due to the way Microsoft Windows displays these images. See this BBC article for some background: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4566504.stm The code hidden in the images could potentially log every key you type when you access, for instance, your banking website (thus enabling him to log in to your bank and spend your money as he pleases). It could send emails to everyone in your address book (or simply harvest them as other "live" email addresses for more mailing lists). It could start deleting vital files from your computer. It could email documents from your "My Documents" folder where many people keep their private details. There are countless possibilities as to what the malicious code could do and this is why it is vital that users keep up-to-date with security patches (as Microsoft do try to solve critical flaws as soon as possible via http://www.windowsupdate.com). Without seeing the exact coding of the email it is impossible to tell what tricks the spammer is up to (it may still be difficult even with the exact coding as the spammer is likely to have encoded the information - he wouldn't want someone just to steal this information from him as it is valuable!). In summary, at the very least by downloading the pictures the spammer now knows that someone at your IP address exists (he can do this by looking at what IP addresses requested to see his image in his website webserver logs). You may or may not notice a small surge in spam emails to your email address but hopefully that is all that will have happened. I hope this answers your question but if you do require more information on the subject I will be happy to help out more. I am reluctant to explain the techniques exactly as it could easily give people ideas to try these techniques out for themselves and I would rather I received less spam than I already do! Further information: http://www.whatismyip.com (try getting your IP address from here then entering it into the following site) http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm?GetLocation http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,64178,00.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ip_address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolocation | |
| |
|
probonopublico-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$10.00
Hi Pal You really are a great pal. I've done A Virus Scan and everything's OK (allegedly). Anyhow, I'm confident that I can sleep tonight. It's been an enlightening experience and, of course, I shall now be more careful. Many thanks for your help. All the Best Bryan |
|
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: sonoritygenius-ga on 28 May 2006 07:19 PDT |
Another ebay scam, wow. I wonder how they got your email when you dont even have an ebay account! Since you displayed those images - I really think you should revert your registry. Just do a System Restore to an earlier point of "System Checkpoint" Though, hijack-this log would be even better! |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 May 2006 07:32 PDT |
Hi sonoritygenius-ga, I do have an ebay account (although I only ever buy) but they didn't figure out my Registered Name. I guess that they picked up my email address from somewhere and just hoped that I would have an ebay account. I've also had phishing attempts supposedly from banks where I don't even have an account. I suppose that if they send enough stuff out some of it is going to stick. Thanks for your advice about doing a System Restore to an earlier point of "System Checkpoint" but I dunno how to do this. Could you please explain? Many thanks! Bryan |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: sonoritygenius-ga on 28 May 2006 07:48 PDT |
Sure! Its a feature that comes with latest version of Windows: i.e Windows XP Home and Windows XP Professional (though possibly also for ME, 2000) Its a cool feature that allows you to restore your computer registry/and settings to an earlier time - if - and when - the present configuration is in suspect of having malware (or unwanted pests hehe ;) I hope you have Windows XP! if so click Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > System Restore Than click Restore to an earlier point, a calendar-like will show up - click a date 2-3 days prior to present day or whenever you recieved the email, and click Ok and it will automatically do everything else!! Hope it works.. :) |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 28 May 2006 07:54 PDT |
Hello Bryan, I saw sonoritygenius-ga's comment saying it might be helpful to perform a "System Restore". I do not believe that this would be helpful in this case - this is usually used when you have installed a piece of software that has corrupted your system - although this might have happened by viewing the images it is *highly* unlikely - and restoring your system to an earlier time may cause more problems than it is worth. My experience with System Restore is that it does restore your PC to an earlier time but still leaves unwanted files behind (it just makes it more difficult for your PC to find them!). The most likely scenario here is that the spammer has simply harvested your email address and marked it as belonging to a human (rather than a computer)! Do you have access to Anti-virus software and Anti-Spyware software? It would certainly be worth your while running this to ensure nothing sinister is lurking on your PC now. System Restore: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Restore |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: sonoritygenius-ga on 28 May 2006 07:59 PDT |
polly's probably right, that email probably did not install any keyloggers that monitor what you do and type.. but I am not sure how spammers operate so I dunno hehe but whenever you have a program giving you problems, it sure can be helpful to revert the settings back! :) |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: frde-ga on 28 May 2006 09:32 PDT |
@Probono I use something called MailWasher - it is not the most brilliant software, but it does what I want It collects all Emails from one or more accounts without deleting them at the Mailserver, and allows you to poke around looking at them. You can then delete them if suspicious. Because it is very crude, it cannot do more than display the text source. For my mail reader I use a very old version of Eudora, since malware writers target new stuff it rather makes sense to avoid new things. If you are using XP then it makes sense to set up a User Account that has b*gger all rights - set up so it can't install programs and has no write access to just about everything. A little paranoia does no harm - sometimes it is justified |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 May 2006 09:49 PDT |
Hi sonoritygenius-ga ... Or can I just call you 'Genius'? I do have XP Pro on this machine. Hi frde-ga ... I tried MailWasher once but I cannot now recall why I stopped using it. Thanks anyway. Kindest regards to you both. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 28 May 2006 10:18 PDT |
Thanks for the 5-star rating and generous tip. They are both appreciated. I would also like to second frde-ga's tip of using Mailwasher. It is an excellent piece of software (although it is beginning to look a little dated). I used to use Mailwasher as my spam filter too until I discovered that you could use Gmail just as easily. I own my own domain name and I divert all the email sent to that domain name to my Gmail account. My Gmail account then kindly filters the spam for me (less than 5 spam emails get through a week out of several hundred emails). The beauty of using Gmail is it indicates when it believes an email is phishing for information :-) I only ever give out my domain name email address and anyone who emails my Gmail account directly is treated as spam immediately. Bryan, if you are interested in setting a system up like this please let me know and I can post some more instructions here. |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 May 2006 11:41 PDT |
Many thanks, Pal I'll keep your offer in mind. Regarding the English Fast Bowlers, no I didn't get the answer I was seeking. I took a look at Answerfinder's List and thought I bet my great pal will have great fun writing a script for this. So, because I didn't want to spoil your fun, I am still in the dark. Go on .... Amaze me! Thanks again Bryan |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 28 May 2006 11:56 PDT |
I'm still working on the list of bowlers, I've parsed the list of English cricketers to remove any non-fast/fast-medium bowlers and should have the results tomorrow. Since we won the 2nd Test today I now have time on my hands, I shall finish this tomorrow! Only UK-born fast/fast-medium bowlers count and the county that they first played for counts as the team that provided them to the English cause, is that correct? |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 May 2006 12:16 PDT |
Great stuff, Pal They don't necessarily have to have been born in England. For example: Devon Malcolm, Phil de Freitas, Chris Lewis and 'Syd' Lawrence would be OK even if they weren't born in England (I don't know whether they were or not). And, of course, the two Jones from Wales (Simon and his dad, Jeff) are also OK. The County that they first played for gets the credit; subsequent Counties don't count. Good Luck! Bryan |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 29 May 2006 02:59 PDT |
The results are in. First, this is what I did... I parsed the information given on the Cricinfo website for each cricketer who has played for England and extracted their place of birth and their first English county cricket team. The only players I counted where players who using Cricinfo's information were fast or fast-medium bowlers (medium-fast did not count). Place of birth - number of players ================================== Australia - 3 Barbados - 1 Buckinghamshire - 1 Cheshire - 6 Co Durham - 1 Derbyshire - 11 Devon - 1 Dominica - 1 Essex - 7 Gloucestershire - 2 Guyana - 1 Hampshire - 3 Hereford - 2 Huntingdonshire - 1 India - 1 Ireland - 1 Jamaica - 2 Kent - 8 Lancashire - 13 Leicestershire - 4 Lincolnshire - 1 London - 16 Middlesex - 5 New Zealand - 1 Norfolk - 1 Northamptonshire - 2 Northern Rhodesia - 1 Northumberland - 1 Nottinghamshire - 12 Scotland - 1 St Vincent - 1 Staffordshire - 3 Surrey - 9 Sussex - 2 Wales - 4 Warwickshire - 4 Wiltshire - 1 Worcestershire - 3 Yorkshire - 17 First county - number of players ================================ Derbyshire - 16 Durham - 3 Essex - 11 Glamorgan - 6 Gloucestershire - 4 Hampshire - 8 Kent - 14 Lancashire - 15 Leicestershire - 5 Middlesex - 10 Northamptonshire - 5 Nottinghamshire - 12 Somerset - 7 Surrey - 16 Sussex - 3 Warwickshire - 5 Worcestershire - 5 Yorkshire - 10 So it looks like if you want your son to be a future English fast/fast-medium bowler, the place to be born is Yorkshire or alternatively you should look to making him play for Surrey or Derbyshire! |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 May 2006 04:06 PDT |
Amazing! Very many thanks, Pal. I am mightily impressed. Was it all done with Java? All the Best Bryan |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: frde-ga on 29 May 2006 04:59 PDT |
@Probo You probably found that Mailwasher created crashes I autoload absolutely no Applications, on startup I manually load MailWasher and wait for it to settle down, then I quickly manually load the other Apps that I like to keep running. The original version, and the oldish version that I currently have, are not particularly well written - it is in Delphi, a language I know, and I'm distinctly unimpressed by the implementation. However, despite those drawbacks, it does /exactly/ what I want, which is to safely screen and manually examine all incoming mail. I'm not concerned whether it thinks it is Spam (I don't really trust Spam detectors) but I'm very concerned about zapping viruses. I also suggest that you set up your browser to disable ActiveX controls, letting those things run is like executing a remote program on your machine. |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 29 May 2006 05:08 PDT |
Hi Bryan, It was done with a little Perl scripting and minor human tweaking. Basically Perl fetched each of the 633 pages from the Cricinfo site and told me the information that I needed from each page, it was a lot quicker than reading each page myself! Sorry Lancashire did not come out on top! palitoy-ga |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 May 2006 05:31 PDT |
Wow, Pal This Pearl woman sounds very helpful. Is she also glamorous? Envious of Hove |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: palitoy-ga on 29 May 2006 06:12 PDT |
:-) Perl is very handy and she loves doing boring, tedious and repetitive tasks. Sadly she is not as glamourous as Ruby, the new(ish) girl on the block :-) |
Subject:
Re: A New Spam/Scam: Am I At Risk?
From: smithkarl-ga on 05 Jun 2006 10:53 PDT |
Hi, I think it is useless to make a discussion about spoof emails for a long time. All emails from ebay, paypal, amazon, stormpay and other famous big companies will always call you by the name. If paypal sends you an email they start with Dear Karl Smith not Dear Customer. My gMail 99% of the time trashes these messages instantly. I delete them myself the rest if they don't begin with Dear Karl Smith. They are all spoof. Regards, Delete Spyware http://www.deletespyware-adware.com/ |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |