|
|
Subject:
Sequence of numbers
Category: Science Asked by: priotus-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
02 Jun 2006 17:10 PDT
Expires: 08 Jun 2006 02:45 PDT Question ID: 734865 |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Sequence of numbers
From: scaramanga8-ga on 02 Jun 2006 17:54 PDT |
I do not believe that there is a next number. What is the context of these? |
Subject:
Re: Sequence of numbers
From: markvmd-ga on 02 Jun 2006 18:46 PDT |
Either 82 or 91. If I thought about it for a minute I could figure out which but that would take away from a Researcher's answer. |
Subject:
Re: Sequence of numbers
From: redfoxjumps-ga on 03 Jun 2006 00:33 PDT |
0 6 4 9 0 9 36 -9 18 Don't see a pattern, But number 9 Seems important and the negative excursion. |
Subject:
Re: Sequence of numbers
From: markvmd-ga on 03 Jun 2006 14:22 PDT |
The sum of the digits of each of the last six numbers is ten. That's why i'm going with 82 or 91. I realize I'm ignoring some stuff but I also believe any problem can be solved with a bigger hammer. |
Subject:
Re: Sequence of numbers
From: matthew13-ga on 05 Jun 2006 02:32 PDT |
I think that the next number in the sequence is 100, and that 6 at the start of the sequence is a mistake, meant to read 46. Relationship between numbers (6=46): 46 -36 10 45 09 19 -09 00 19 09 09 28 27 36 64 -45 -09 55 27 18 73 09 27 100 |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |