|
|
Subject:
Cardboard or tin boxes more environmentally-friendly?
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: greenquest-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
06 Jun 2006 11:07 PDT
Expires: 20 Jun 2006 18:58 PDT Question ID: 735781 |
I am an environmentally-concerned artist that creates recycled cards and stationary and would like to know if it would be better to package them in cardboard boxes or tin boxes. What is the relative environmental impact of each? or do you have a better environmental solution? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Cardboard or tin boxes more environmentally-friendly?
From: cynthia-ga on 06 Jun 2006 15:01 PDT |
It seems to me that since cardboard is biodegradable, it is more environmentally friendly. Tin will eventually rust away to nothing, but the cardboard would be long gone. |
Subject:
Re: Cardboard or tin boxes more environmentally-friendly?
From: pinkfreud-ga on 06 Jun 2006 15:32 PDT |
Tin does not rust. Tin artifacts have been found that are thousands of years old. Cardboard is essentially wood pulp; if exposed to the elements, it deteriorates and mingles with the soil. If I were in your position, I'd choose cardboard for its environmental friendliness. However, some commercially-produced cardboard boxes use plastic or other synthetic material as a glaze or coating. You might want to steer clear of that. |
Subject:
Re: Cardboard or tin boxes more environmentally-friendly?
From: cynthia-ga on 06 Jun 2006 17:25 PDT |
Huh? I was confused by the first link below, then the mystery is solved by the second link. String: rust tin remove Sherwin Williams Paint FAQ's http://www.sherwin-williams.com/FAQ/pro_exterior_product_sel_faq.jsp ..."Q. I have an old, rusty tin roof to paint. What do you recommend? A. First, determine that the roof is indeed tin, and not galvanized steel. If it is tin, remove any loose rust with a wire brush; then clean and rinse the surface to remove any dirt, mildew or surface contaminants. After the roof is dry, apply a slow-drying, rust-inhibitive oil-based primer followed by two coats of a quality topcoat..." But then, I entered" [ "tin does not rust" ]and found the problem. Notes on Metals and Common Alloys http://sunny.crk.umn.edu/courses/AFSM/2243/Lectures/Notes%20on%20Metals%20and%20Common%20Alloys.doc (BOTTOM LINE) ..."Tin- This metal has been extracted for thousands of years. Pure tin does not rust . Tin cans contain less than 1% by weight of actual tin..." SO! The moral of the story is if you select TIN, make sure it is 100% tin, not an alloy. Thanks for the heads up oh Pink one! |
Subject:
Re: Cardboard or tin boxes more environmentally-friendly?
From: myoarin-ga on 07 Jun 2006 07:36 PDT |
All very true, but I suspect that Greenquest-ga is thinking about tin-plated iron boxes (like "tin cans", "tin" boxes for chocolates, etc.). Pure tin is too brittle to be made into thin-walled boxes. Go with cardboard, unless you expect that the price of your work can justify the expense of packaging in "tin" boxes, which will then be kept for other use. Environmentally, the production of the boxes should also be considered, which also goes against the use of metal. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |