a- Sugar prices have been increasing pretty rapidly.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4743082.stm That might explain
some of the difference between the two prices, if you received the
quotes at different times.
$200 per metric tonne seems too good to be true (which generally means
it is to be mistrusted). Could the person have accidentally typed in
"dollar" instead of "pound"? Or are his units nonmetric/a little off?
I doubt he'd sell sugar to you at half the market price.
b&c- As of today, sugar costs $443.5 per metric tonne.
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=129788 If
I am not mistaken, the price of sugar is determined like the price of
gold or anything else: whatever people are paying for it is the price.
In the Liffe exchange, that happened to be $443.5.
4. If it does turn out that trading in the open market is cheaper than
London, that's probably because the cost of transpotation to London is
greater than the difference between the prices. That way, both buyer
and seller profit more from the deal than if the sugar were purchased
in London. Also, it's important to note that London is a large mass of
consumers, which will drive prices up.
5. I'm going to skip this one. If you want a Google Researcher to
answer it, you'll probably have to reduce the number of companies
you're looking for or pay more than $5 (10 cents per company is not a
lot, especially because 25% of that goes to Google).
6. Two rules of thumb: if it seems too good to be true, it usually is.
Make sure that whoever is recommending or condeming a certain trading
partner has no financial steak in your choice of a business partner.
Hope this helps. |