|
|
Subject:
Purchasing an old BMW
Category: Sports and Recreation > Automotive Asked by: seeman-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
04 Jul 2006 15:17 PDT
Expires: 03 Aug 2006 15:17 PDT Question ID: 743360 |
I am contemplating purchasing a late 80's to early 90's BMW 525 or 635 series. I have been told that it is very expensive to maintain a BMW. I know that I will encounter maintenance issues with a car of any make that is this old. However, will a BMW of this age cost me substantially more than a Toyota Camry or a Honda Accord of the same age to maintain? |
|
Subject:
Re: Purchasing an old BMW
Answered By: gregaw-ga on 07 Jul 2006 08:12 PDT Rated: |
Here is a comparison of common repair costs for the three vehicles that you mentioned. ***1990-96 BMW 5-Series*** http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/Used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2118/act/usedcarreviewreliability/ Item Name Repair Cost A/C Compressor $1,280 Alternator $610 Automatic Transmission or Transaxle $1,150 Brakes $255 Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing $875 Exhaust System $1,015 Radiator $710 Shocks and/or Struts $865 Timing Chain or Belt $1,920 ***1990-93 Honda Accord*** http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/Used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2047/act/usedcarreviewreliability/ Item Name Repair Cost A/C Compressor $530 Alternator $355 Automatic Transmission or Transaxle $1,055 Brakes $250 Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing $550 Constant Velocity Joints $670 Exhaust System $465 Radiator $485 Shocks and/or Struts $545 Timing Chain or Belt $350 1992-96 Toyota Camry http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/Used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2105/act/usedcarreviewreliability/ Item Name Repair Cost A/C Compressor $865 Alternator $375 Automatic Transmission or Transaxle $1,067 Brakes $145 Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing $600 Constant Velocity Joints $500 Exhaust System $550 Radiator $580 Shocks and/or Struts $800 Timing Chain or Belt $220 Many of the repairs or substantially more costly for the BMW, most notably the "Timing Chain or Belt", which is more than 8 times as much as the Toyota. I did look at a few other BMW models in that era on that same website and they had similar costs. Given this information I would conclude that the chances of spending "substantially more" on the BMW in the long run is statistically true. Please let me know if you found this information useful. Thanks! |
seeman-ga
rated this answer:
Thank you very much. This is exactly what I wanted |
|
Subject:
Re: Purchasing an old BMW
From: pinkfreud-ga on 05 Jul 2006 11:20 PDT |
My stepsister has owned several BMWs. She once mentioned that she they were quite reliable, and were low-maintenance as far as the number of incidents that required service, but when service was required, the cost was often high because of the price of replacement parts. |
Subject:
Re: Purchasing an old BMW
From: veconofix-ga on 18 Aug 2006 22:04 PDT |
Wow! I need to increase my prices!!! I guess those must be dealership prices in New York City or something. In Florida we get about half of those quoted prices. Nevertheless, the proportions are about right, with one exception: Although I would recommend a Camry ove a BMW, the "8 times the cost for a timing belt/chain" figure is misleading! There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between a timing chain and a timing belt!!!! A timing belt should be replaced every 50,000 to 80,000 miles (manufacturers differ in the recommended interval: see my article http://econofix.com/tbelt.html) whereas a timing chain such as the one BMW uses is normally good for the life of the engine. (At least 150,000-200,000 miles) Thus that particular spec is an "apples to oranges" example. The advice is still good, though: I'd recommend the Camry over the BMW. The Bimmer, though is a quite solid and well engineered vehicle, and it for sure has a higher "wow" value than a Camry. Because there are more Camrys on the road than BMW's you would be able to get parts from an aftermarket supplier rather than being forced to get things from the dealer. Why do I prefer Toyotas to Hondas? One of the many reasons is in that timing belt: almost all Hondas will bend valves if the timing belt breaks, whereas practically NO Toyotas do. Although if you change the belt when you are supposed to this isn''t a problem, this to me indicates a design "attitude". Toyota wants to build a car that will "take a beating". Honda, like many other cars on the market, doesn't have that goal so much in mind. I can tell you of many Honda and Nissan "nightmares": $500 distributors that trash out at 75,000 miles and can be obtained only from the dealer come to mind immediately. So I would recommend Toyota without hesitation, BMW also, but be prepared to pay a bit more, and I'd discourage the Hondas and Nissans. I'm an ASE certified master mechanic, I have owned my own shop for 30+ years. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |