Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Need to calculate bearing capacity of steel beam in residential rebuild. ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Need to calculate bearing capacity of steel beam in residential rebuild.
Category: Science
Asked by: cpopetz-ga
List Price: $50.00
Posted: 18 Jul 2006 09:31 PDT
Expires: 17 Aug 2006 09:31 PDT
Question ID: 747389
I am adding a second story to my house, and need to know if the
existing steel beam under the first floor, which is supporting the one
load bearing wall, can bear the weight of a second story.  The roof is
bearing on the exterior walls, so it is not a factor.  I am looking at
two floors with live loads of 30 psf and dead loads of 20 psf, plus
one 2nd floor ceiling with no live load and a dead load of 10 psf.
(The ceiling joists are not roofing members, and thus are bearing on
the wall.)  The existing steel beam is an old-style S-flange, namely
an S 7x20 (Ixx=42.4, Iyy=3.17).   It joists are 22' long, so that's a
tributary span of 11'.  The beam is 24' and is supported at 12' with a
column on a concrete slab.

I need to know how to calculate (a) the load that beam is bearing with
one floor, (b) what it bears with the second floor and extra ceiling,
and (c) whether the beam is strong enough to handle that.

I'd love to know the actual equations for these things, so I can do
this calculation next time on my own, and so when I present this to
the the building inspector I know what I'm talking about.
Answer  
Subject: Re: Need to calculate bearing capacity of steel beam in residential rebuild.
Answered By: redhoss-ga on 18 Jul 2006 11:17 PDT
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Hello cpopetz, you seem to have done a very good job of describing
your problem. I think we can get some answers.

(a) the load that beam is bearing with
one floor

NOTE: What you have here is a continuous beam with two equal spans.
However, to make things a little easier we can consider it as a simple
beam. The answer will be a little conservative, but that is probably
good and these formulas are not 100% accurate anyway.

The beam formulas for this loading are:

M (maximum bending moment) = wl^2/8
D (deflection @ center of span) = 5wl^4/384 EI
NOTE: Maximum deflection is limited to D = l/360 = 12 x 12 / 360 = 0.40 in
w (load per foot) = (30 + 20 + 10)psf x 11' = 660 lb per ft
l (beam span) = 12 ft
Where E is a constant for steel = 30,000,000 psi
And I is the moment of inertia

Solving for M:

M = 660 x 12^2 / 8 = 11,880 ft lb = 142,560 in lb

The allowable bending stress for structural steel (s) = 0.55 x 36,000 psi
                                                  = 19,800 psi

The section modulus of the required beam (S) = M/s = 142,560/19,800 
                                             = 7.2 in^3

Now we must calculate the required I (moment of inertia):

Solving for I in the above formula for deflection we get:

I = 5wl^4/384 ED = (5 x 660 x 12^4 / 384 x 30,000,000 x 0.40) x 1728
NOTE: 1728 is a conversion factor to get the proper units for I

I =  25.66 in^4

This tells us what we already know, that the existing beam was more than adequate.

(b) what it bears with the second floor and extra ceiling

The only difference in these calcs is that we now add in another 30 +
20 psf. So, w now becomes: 110 x 11' = 1210 lb per ft
Solving for M:

M = 1210 x 12^2 / 8 = 21,780 ft lb = 261,360 in lb

The allowable bending stress for structural steel (s) = 0.55 x 36,000 psi
                                                  = 19,800 psi

The section modulus of the required beam (S) = M/s = 261,360/19,800 
                                             = 13.2 in^3

Now we must calculate the required I (moment of inertia):

Solving for I in the above formula for deflection we get:

I = 5wl^4/384 ED = (5 x 1210 x 12^4 / 384 x 30,000,000 x 0.40) x 1728
NOTE: 1728 is a conversion factor to get the proper units for I

I =  47.04 in^4

(c) whether the beam is strong enough to handle that

I checked your numbers for the existing S 7x20 and you are exactly
right. So, we are comparing our calculated required value of 47.04
in^4 to 42.4 in^4. I would say that your existing beam is adequate. I
have a beam program that will handle the actual end conditions that
you have. I will check out the beam using that program and let you
know what results I get. If there is any of what I have posted that
you don't understand, please ask for a clarification.

Back with you soon, Redhoss

Clarification of Answer by redhoss-ga on 18 Jul 2006 11:44 PDT
I just ran your beam on the software and got:

Maximum moment = 200,096 in lb
Deflection = 0.31 inch

Since we are allowed 0.4 inch, I believe your existing beam is
adequate. The only area your building inspector might question is the
column footing. This would get a little sticky since you probably
don't know the footing size. I would argue that the footing was
designed to support a fully loaded beam. It seems that the beam was
designed with the possibility of adding a second floor. Please let me
know if you have further questions.

Request for Answer Clarification by cpopetz-ga on 18 Jul 2006 12:48 PDT
Thanks so much!  That all makes sense to me.

The inspector is also concerned about the column itself.  (He hasn't
seen it yet, he's going by my descriptions.)

There are actually two columns, although they are placed so close
together that I have assumed one was used to install the other, or
that one was installed after the other for some reason (though since
the steel beam isn't likely to sag, I can't imagine the reason.)

Anway, the column at 12' looks like a cast concrete pier, 6" diameter
octagonal, with two peices of rebar running vertical in it.  It's on a
24" square pad, but I don't know how deep.  The column 1 foot away
from it is a telescoping steel column, on another 24" square pad.

Both columns are in good shape, on rust on the steel, no
cracking/crumbling on the concrete.

Any thoughts on this?  I realize this is a lot more vague than the
previous question.

Clarification of Answer by redhoss-ga on 18 Jul 2006 15:07 PDT
Thanks for the tip, five stars, and kind words. Without some very
specific info on the columns I don't think anyone can give you
anything other than an educated guess. It sounds to me like the
contractor that did the original job was well advised. I would suspect
that the columns and footings are well designed. Other than this, I
don't know what to say.
cpopetz-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $10.00
Very helpful,and very quick! I am so glad to have used this service.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy