Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: dividend irrelevance ( No Answer,   6 Comments )
Question  
Subject: dividend irrelevance
Category: Business and Money > Finance
Asked by: speedemon73-ga
List Price: $2.00
Posted: 25 Jul 2006 10:34 PDT
Expires: 24 Aug 2006 10:34 PDT
Question ID: 749366
You own 2,000 shares of Patriot Corporation, which is about to raise
its dividend from $.75 to $1.00 per share. The share price is currently
$100. You would prefer that the dividend remain at its current level.
What would you do to offset the effects of the increase in the dividend?
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Jul 2006 11:06 PDT
 
Increase my intake of alcohol accordingly.
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: bstsurf-ga on 25 Jul 2006 15:13 PDT
 
why would you want to offset an increase in dividend? Makes no sense. 
You could sell short the equivalent number of shares that is the
difference between the .75 to 1.00 (5 shares) and then you would owe
that dividend.
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nostril-ga on 28 Jul 2006 08:07 PDT
 
If trading costs were zero then the most sensible way to offset the
increase in the dividend is to use the extra $0.25 per share ($500 in
total) to by new shares in Patriot ($500 = 5 new shares). This way
your investment in Patriot increases and offsets the decline in their
net assets that results from the additional $0.25 they pay out.

Alternatively you may be able to elect to have some of your dividends
paid in scip. This is where Patriot give you newly issued shares
instead of cash dividends. The new shares they give you will be worth
the value of the cash dividends you would normally receive. This has
the same effect as the suggestion above of buying new shares but would
have the avantage of being genuinely costless. If this option is
available then you would want to get a quarter of you dividends paid
in scip.
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nostril-ga on 28 Jul 2006 08:09 PDT
 
I meant scrip not scip.
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: peguy97-ga on 14 Aug 2006 10:41 PDT
 
The simple answer is that you would sell off 500 of your 2000 shares,
thus retaining an amount that would yield the same $1,500 worth of
dividends
Subject: Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nost-ga on 18 Oct 2006 14:39 PDT
 
peguy97 doesn't know what he/she is talking about

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy