![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
dividend irrelevance
Category: Business and Money > Finance Asked by: speedemon73-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
25 Jul 2006 10:34 PDT
Expires: 24 Aug 2006 10:34 PDT Question ID: 749366 |
You own 2,000 shares of Patriot Corporation, which is about to raise its dividend from $.75 to $1.00 per share. The share price is currently $100. You would prefer that the dividend remain at its current level. What would you do to offset the effects of the increase in the dividend? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Jul 2006 11:06 PDT |
Increase my intake of alcohol accordingly. |
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: bstsurf-ga on 25 Jul 2006 15:13 PDT |
why would you want to offset an increase in dividend? Makes no sense. You could sell short the equivalent number of shares that is the difference between the .75 to 1.00 (5 shares) and then you would owe that dividend. |
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nostril-ga on 28 Jul 2006 08:07 PDT |
If trading costs were zero then the most sensible way to offset the increase in the dividend is to use the extra $0.25 per share ($500 in total) to by new shares in Patriot ($500 = 5 new shares). This way your investment in Patriot increases and offsets the decline in their net assets that results from the additional $0.25 they pay out. Alternatively you may be able to elect to have some of your dividends paid in scip. This is where Patriot give you newly issued shares instead of cash dividends. The new shares they give you will be worth the value of the cash dividends you would normally receive. This has the same effect as the suggestion above of buying new shares but would have the avantage of being genuinely costless. If this option is available then you would want to get a quarter of you dividends paid in scip. |
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nostril-ga on 28 Jul 2006 08:09 PDT |
I meant scrip not scip. |
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: peguy97-ga on 14 Aug 2006 10:41 PDT |
The simple answer is that you would sell off 500 of your 2000 shares, thus retaining an amount that would yield the same $1,500 worth of dividends |
Subject:
Re: dividend irrelevance
From: nost-ga on 18 Oct 2006 14:39 PDT |
peguy97 doesn't know what he/she is talking about |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |