|
|
Subject:
Analog Sensors for Automotive Ride Height
Category: Science > Instruments and Methods Asked by: jackolsen-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
25 Jul 2006 14:57 PDT
Expires: 24 Aug 2006 14:57 PDT Question ID: 749469 |
I'm looking for an inexpensive way to feed ride height data into a commercial data logger in order to test different aerodynamic pieces for my race car. Ideally, I'd be able to detect changes in ride height in half-millimeter (or less) increments, which the data logging software could 'clean up' and compare. I've looked into laser ride height sensors and both linear and rotary potentiometers for it, but don't really have enough knowledge to put a cheap and effective system together without your guidance. Durability over time is less important than accuracy for a few days of testing. To offer more data, the car has 600#/in springs in the back and 300#/in springs in the front. It generates about 250 pounds of positive lift at 100 mph, and I'd like to be able to see differences in negative lift in at least increments of 10 pounds. If strain gauges would be a better way to go, I'm all ears about that, too. Thanks! |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Analog Sensors for Automotive Ride Height
From: socraticinstlouis-ga on 27 Jul 2006 21:34 PDT |
There are so many ways you could do this that it's not even funny. The build-or-buy tradeoff will probably be the decision-maker for you. If you have $1k to spend on the sensor (exclusive of data recording means), I would be thinking some more about that laser sensor (the so-called triangulation sensors from Sick and others). A potentiometer as one leg of a Wheatstone bridge could certainly be made to work, but will require some effort to get it adequately linked to the suspension, and calibrated so that you can relate the measurements back to the ride-height answers you're looking for. Same goes for an LVDT. Even with the engineering to integrate it into the suspension, the potentiometer might be the low-cost solution. An LVDT would be a good substitute for the potentiometer if more durability in the face of environmental contaminants (dust, water) is needed. Strain-gage sensing of the deformation of the springs is an interesting idea, but it seems like overkill in light of easier solutions, above. There might be gotchas, too, in the presence of strain in the spring that doesn't arise strictly from spring compression and extension, i.e. strain that comes from deformation of the suspension parts themselves and that ends up twisting (or in other ways deforming) the spring independent of changes in ride height. |
Subject:
Re: Analog Sensors for Automotive Ride Height
From: veconofix-ga on 28 Jul 2006 06:42 PDT |
I'm not sure of the sensitivity, but any car with air suspension has ride height sensors which feed the suspension computer. Lincoln Continentals are the vehicles I've seen the most of this on, although other manufacturers also use air suspension. They normally have 2 sensors (one for each front wheel)in front and a single sensor for the rear. They connect between the suspension and the body via a rod. These are just variable resistors that change value as the suspension goes up and down. Of course you would have to come up with a/d conversion and software for these. another idea: the vehicle control computers on the later models MAY be able to read the ride height values out via a scan tool. I'm not sure about this: yopu could check out the manual on one of the late models. If so, you could install ride sensors with their computer and just read out the values with a scan tool. you could probably get everything from a junkyard cheaply. i'd be interested to know how it turns out! econofix |
Subject:
Re: Analog Sensors for Automotive Ride Height
From: dirttrack-ga on 28 Jul 2006 17:45 PDT |
I circle track race and know how expensive it can be. A wise man once said the way to make a small fortune in racing is to start with a large fortune! Anyway i have also used laser gauges and lvdts @ work and they are big$$$$. These items from mcmaster-carr may do the trick. The circuit would be a simple 3 wire poteniameter for either device and your data would be easy to scale to the stroke length of the input device. My only concern with the string pot would be if it would retract (spring loaded) as fast as your suspension travels. data logger-6395k56 linear string pot-6440k2 or linear transducer-7383k16 good luck |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |