|
|
Subject:
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Category: Relationships and Society > Politics Asked by: npb17-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
11 Oct 2002 17:04 PDT
Expires: 10 Nov 2002 16:04 PST Question ID: 75496 |
EXPLAIN WHY RADIO AND TELEVISION DO NOT HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AS THE PRINT MEDIA. DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS? WHY? |
|
Subject:
Re: POLITICAL SCIENCE
Answered By: darrel-ga on 11 Oct 2002 18:02 PDT Rated: |
Hello-- I have the answers to your questions. Radio and television do not have the same rights and freedoms as the print media because of the technology involved. The Federal Communications Commission was formed to regulate the broadcast industries. There is no similar commission to regulate the print media. The FCC was originally created to license individuals who could work in the media and to make sure broadcast stations in the same regions did not operate on the same frequencies. It is my opinion that this use of the FCC is valid. But the FCC overstepped its bounds when it decided to regulate how many broadcast stations a company can own simultaneously and by regulating equal time provisions and programming rules for radio and television stations. You may read about the Federal Communications Commission at the agency's web site. The link is http://www.fcc.gov/ You may read about efforts to reform the FCC at the company's web site. The link is http://www.fcc.gov/fcc_reform/ You may read about the FCC's ability to regulate broadband capabilities. The link is http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/ You may read about the FCC's reexamination of its media ownership policies. The link is http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/ I hope this helps! darrel-ga |
npb17-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: POLITICAL SCIENCE
From: expertlaw-ga on 11 Oct 2002 20:26 PDT |
Part of the rationale for the regulation of the broadcast media is that they come into the home, whether or not they are "invited". This explains in part why cable companies have long been able to broadcast material that would not be allowed on broadcast television - cable shows only reach the members of your household if you choose to subscribe to them. Another part of the rationale is "spectrum scarcity" - only so many television stations can be broadcast, whereas a community can at least in theory enjoy an unlimited number of newspapers. Due to technological advancement, spectrum scarcity is much less an issue today than it was when broadcast technologies were first introduced. |
Subject:
Re: POLITICAL SCIENCE
From: mvguy-ga on 11 Oct 2002 23:56 PDT |
A key factor that has not been mentioned -- and the main reason that First Amendment protections are not fully honored for broadcasters -- is that the space through which radio waves travel is considered to be public property. Individuals and businesses may own the transmitters, but the people (as represented by the federal government) own the medium through which the radio waves travel. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |