|
|
Subject:
geographics
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: nealnb-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
29 Aug 2006 17:19 PDT
Expires: 28 Sep 2006 17:19 PDT Question ID: 760637 |
where do poor white people live in the United States? |
|
Subject:
Re: geographics
Answered By: easterangel-ga on 29 Aug 2006 19:55 PDT |
Hi! Thanks for the question. The top 10 states having more poor white people according to the Census Bureau are the following. 1. California - 27,762 2. Texas - 18,838 3. Florida - 14,482 4. New York - 13,939 5. Pennsylvania - 10,588 6. Illinois - 9,923 7. Ohio - 9,680 8. Michigan - 8,101 9. New Jersey - 6,816 10. North Carolina - 6,299 If you are going to go by region, here are the numbers. The South has more white people in poverty according to the Census Bureau. 1. South - 80,991 2. Midwest - 55,574 3. West - 55,061 4. Northeast - 43,804 Source: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstc/cps_table_creator.html I hope this would help you in your research. Before rating this answer, please ask for a clarification if you have a question or if you would need further information. Regards, Easterangel-ga Google Answers Researcher | |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: nelson-ga on 29 Aug 2006 18:51 PDT |
trailer parks |
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: ansel001-ga on 29 Aug 2006 23:41 PDT |
Easterangel, Your answer looks very low. My gut instinct is that the number of poor people in the United States should be a few million at least. And since whites greatly outnumber any other demographic, the number of poor whites should be larger than the number of poor from any other race, even if the percentage of poor whites is smaller. How did you define poor? |
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: easterangel-ga on 29 Aug 2006 23:48 PDT |
Hi ansel001-ga! The definition of poor and the numbers came from the Census Bureau's numbers so they are pretty tight I should say. Thanks. |
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: czh-ga on 30 Aug 2006 02:53 PDT |
Some general US poverty statistics. http://www.prcdc.org/summaries/poverty/poverty.html |
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: barneca-ga on 30 Aug 2006 03:31 PDT |
ansel001 is correct. easterangel, you misread the census table in two ways. first, the statistics you quote are, according to the table, "numbers in thousands", so you're off by a factor of 1000. second, you provided the number of people in the "poverty universe", which is a little fuzzy but seems to be, for your table, a rough count of all people classified as white (i.e. people who could potentially be classified as poor whites). i'm not exactly clear on that, and i guess you will want to clarify that before providing a final answer. according to the table, for example, california in 2005 had 3,568,000 white people below the poverty level. i have to ask, did you really believe there were only 235,500 poor white people in the usa? if nothing else, that makes you extraordinarily optimistic... -cab |
Subject:
Re: geographics
From: myoarin-ga on 30 Aug 2006 11:03 PDT |
Neal, That seems to be quite a different question. Despite a back of backing and filling on the numbers, it seems that you have gotten an answer to your original question. Researchers may suggest that you should post a new question for this information. Either way, a definition of "region (or city)" would be useful (would county be adequate for region?), and: do you mean the poorest such city/region with a white majority in comparison with all other city/regions in the States, or just with those with a white majority? I am not trying to be difficult, just to raise in advance a couple of questions that your clarification brings up. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |