Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: History of quality ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   4 Comments )
Question  
Subject: History of quality
Category: Business and Money
Asked by: kdp57-ga
List Price: $20.00
Posted: 14 Oct 2002 17:34 PDT
Expires: 13 Nov 2002 16:34 PST
Question ID: 76616
Since 1960, what were the 5 most important things (ie technology, mass
advertising, etc...) that changed the way
we look at quality, and why? This is the start of a white paper on
quality and perception of quality.  thank you for the help.

Clarification of Question by kdp57-ga on 14 Oct 2002 17:38 PDT
to clarify the question, I think "how it changed the way we look at
quality should be added" if you have any links that would be very
helpful also. thank you.
Answer  
Subject: Re: History of quality
Answered By: omnivorous-ga on 15 Oct 2002 03:28 PDT
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Any list of "most important" on attitudes is going to be subjective,
but the date you've chosen for quality is seminal.

Post World War II western business practices focused on productivity
and cost-per-unit as the prime drivers for business. It was a lesson
learned from Henry Ford's relentless drive to lower the cost of the
Model T; it was re-learned during World War II when "learning curve"
effects showed that with every doubling of production in aircraft and
shipyards, cost per ship would decline by 20%.

But a little-known American statistician, W. Edwards Deming, had
already influenced a generation of Japanese engineers and managers
with a different emphasis -- on quality.  Deming's background as a
statistician had him working with the U.S Bureau of Census after,
WWII, but his real passion was for production applications.

It started with a presentation on statistical quality control to Union
of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) in July, 1950.  Deming
continued to lecture in Japan, donating royalties from his
presentations to JUSE, which eventually developed the Deming Prize for
leading Japanese manufacturers.

Eventually the Japanese effort in Total Quality Control (TQC) would be
re-imported into the United States as Total Quality Management (TQM)
in the 1980s -- but a lot of things had to happen in the meantime. 
Here are five:

1.	1960: W. Edwards Deming is awarded the Second Order Medal of the
Sacred Treasure by the Emperor of Japan for contributions to quality
and dependability in products.
2.	Crisis in the auto industry (1979).  In late 1979, just as Henry
Ford II was retiring from Ford, the auto industry was in crisis.  Ford
and Chrysler were both losing money in the aftershock of the 1970s oil
price hikes.  But worse: Hertz Rent-a-Car maintenance reports being
provided to Ford were showing that Japanese cars were having half the
maintenance problems of American cars, according to David Halberstam's
book, "The Reckoning."  It prompted new Ford President Philip
Caldwell's campaign, "Quality is Job One."
3.	Successful efforts like Ford's didn't go unnoticed in the business
world.  After all, they returned the company to profitability. 
However, Motorola's development of the Six Sigma program in 1986
program came from another crisis.  Motorola, like the auto companies
faced a crisis in its semiconductor operations -- it was losing Far
Eastern customers because of defects in ICs.  In 1985-1986 Richard
Buetow, Motorola's VP Quality, took a group of company executives on a
tour of the best Japanese plants producing consumer products like
watches, TV sets, VCRs and calculators.  According to Electronic
Business (Oct. 1989) "they found these plants to have process defect
rates 500 to 1,000 times better than ordinary electronics companies: 1
to 2 parts per million"

In the engineering-oriented Motorola organization, it set in motion a
goal for Six Sigma reduction in defects -- down to a target of no more
than 3.4 million defects per million units.  It was so successful that
Motorola won the national Baldrige Award in 1988 -- the first year
offered.

4.	By the 1980s, the quality imperative was spreading through
business, with TQM becoming a buzzword.  It was formalized by
Congress, which instructed the National Institute of Standards and
Technology to establish the Baldrige Award (1987):
http://www.quality.nist.gov/Improvement_Act.htm

In doing so, NIST wisely recognized that simple output and defect
measures couldn't be used, but that quality management had to be
reflected in the company's mission -- and go beyond production, to be
supported by sales, development and other parts of an organization.

Baldrige himself had emphasized quality processes in a construction
company that he founded, as well as during his tenure as Postmaster
General.


5.	The earliest specifications for quality had come from military
specifications.  The U.S. Department of Defense and later NASA relied
up MIL STD 9858A through the 1960s; and then BS-5750.  In 1987,
building on the BS-5750 standards, the International Standards
organization (ISO) released ISO 9000.  It was quickly adopted by
European Community standards  group and became a leading guide for
international business.  In 1994 of extensions from production into
selling and other management organizations were made with ISO 9002,
9003, 9004:
International Standards Organization, "History of ISO" (undated):
http://www.iso9.com/information/over_history.html

Some excellent references include:
Deming Institute
"What is the Deming Prize?" (undated)
http://www.deming.org/demingprize/demingprize.html

And two books are recommended, the first on the start of the process,
the second an analysis written recently on how TQM programs have been
applied:
"Out of the Crisis," W. Edwards Deming, 1982

"The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are
Honing Their Performance," Neuman, Pande, Cavanagh, 2002

Also, Halberstam's book is interesting for its look at Deming;
contrasting attitudes of Japanese and American auto executives; and
what spurred U.S. auto companies to action:
"The Reckoning," David Halberstam, 1986


Google search strategy:
Deming + quality
Total Quality Management
Baldrige Award
history + ISO 9000
Motorola + "Six Sigma"

Best regards,

Omnivorous-GA

Request for Answer Clarification by kdp57-ga on 15 Oct 2002 10:59 PDT
I agree with your answer and thank you for taking the time to answer
my question. I also agree that a statement with "most important" is
very subjective. I should have worded it differently. I am very
familiar with TQM, Six Sigma, and ISO standards. (I facilitate TQM
classes and seminars) The general public usually doesn't know much
about those topics, so I was looking at how the public's perception of
quality has changed since 1960. What has influenced their views?
etc...
I don't expect another answer but...if you do have time along the way,
please feel free to contribute. Your views are excellent, they are
concise, and informative.  thanks again.

Clarification of Answer by omnivorous-ga on 15 Oct 2002 11:35 PDT
KDP --

As I was answering the question, I was worried about precisely the
issue that you raise.  Let me think about it a little and try a new
perspective: we know that there was great public appreciation for Sony
TVs and the quality of Japanese cars; we know that Consumer Reports
was influential in demonstrating higher quality levels through its
scathing reviews of American vehicles in the late 1970s.

The reason that I chose to answer the question as I did is that
competitive business analyses taught the lesson to hundreds of
companies the hard way -- and gradually a sense of quality as
"exceeding the expectations of customers" began to pervade society.

Indeed, I worked for Zenith Radio at the time, a company which had
adopted the slogan, "The Quality Goes In Before the Name Goes On" in
1927.  The company had been in running battles with Japanese firms
during the 1970s over dumping and cost-of-production issues.

I worked for Zenith Data Systems -- the PC supplier -- not the TV
company.  As we grew by 50-100% per year from 1980 on, things began to
spin out of control.  In the mid-1980s, middle managers in the
division pushed for TQM programs to unify management, examine costs in
detail, and get investments to the right location.  We came to
understand that in our focus on cost/unit, we were ignoring
significant overhead costs that were serving customers poorly.

From being a supporter of Zenith's anti-dumping efforts, it opened my
eyes to the fact that there were huge indirect costs built into our
management system by carrying too much work-in-process; inefficient
order entry systems; poor MIS support; and even weak product
development measurements.

Best regards,

Omnivorous-GA

Clarification of Answer by omnivorous-ga on 16 Oct 2002 06:30 PDT
KDP --

After checking with GA researchers, it appears that quality attitudes
may be formed at the time one becomes a consumer.  Note that my
influences were from the 1970's -- Sony, Honda, Consumer Reports
writing on the auto industry.

A younger researcher cited Ford's "Quality is Job One"; Avis's "We Try
Harder" -- a very long-lived campaign; and Wal-Mart's "no questions
asked" return policy.

And thanks for the kind words on the rating!

Best regards,

Omnivorous-GA
kdp57-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
excellent answer. my question was not clear, and that is my fault.
omnivorous provided a superb answer to what I had posted. I thank
him/her and look forward to any further dealings with him/her.

Comments  
Subject: Re: History of quality
From: wod-ga on 15 Oct 2002 08:02 PDT
 
I think the way 'we' look at quality hasn't changed at all. The way
companies look at quality has changed a lot though. IMHO, basically
companies go through two stages :

1. "We're making so much money now, let's compromise on quality."

2. "We're losing money, let's improve quality." (which brings them
back to stage 1.)

Sometimes companies never recover from stage 2.
Subject: Re: History of quality
From: kdp57-ga on 15 Oct 2002 10:45 PDT
 
I agree with your 2 stages, and that is focused on the business end as
you stated. I do believe "we" have changed our view of quality or are
at least influenced by outside stimuli ( such as advertising ) and
that alters our perception of quality.
Subject: Re: History of quality
From: wod-ga on 17 Oct 2002 02:18 PDT
 
I suppose an ad would influence someone to 'try' a new product, but in
the end, I think what carries through, that is gets the repeat sales,
is the quality of the product. Unless of course you're talking about
kids, in which case I agree with you wholeheartedly. I know McD's
advertises more, but I still like BK.
Subject: Re: History of quality
From: wod-ga on 17 Oct 2002 02:25 PDT
 
Omnivorous' experiences with Zenith bears out what someone told me
once.. there really is such a thing as too much quality. Quality
costs, and if you can't make up that cost, you're gonna be losing on
every sale. Same thing happened to Digital (Equipment Corporation.)

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy