If an internet company facilitates web contracts between different
individuals from many different states on a systematic basis, which
jurisdiction (state laws) apply to the web contracts? Does the
jurisdiction of an internet web contract apply where the host server
is located? Or where the Offeror learns of acceptance? Or whatever
State plays the most significant role in the web contract?
(*note: this is assuming that the web contract clearly outlines that
the internet company's home state laws apply and that UCITA has not
been adopted by most states)