|
|
Subject:
Cuban Missile Crisis
Category: Relationships and Society > Politics Asked by: dprk007-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
30 Sep 2006 23:06 PDT
Expires: 30 Oct 2006 22:06 PST Question ID: 769842 |
At the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis, How many Soviet Missiles were armed with nuclear bombs and ready to be launched in Cuba? DPRK007 |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: borisshah-ga on 01 Oct 2006 04:48 PDT |
This is from a previously asked question: Number of missiles: As far as I could find, there seems to be no conclusive data regarding the number of missiles. However, reasonable estimates come up from this authoritative source, unclassified CIA paper Learning from the Past - Soviet Deception in the Cuban Missile Crisis, by James H. Hansen (https://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol46no1/article06.html ): "The first SS-4 missiles arrived in Mariel on board the Omsk on 8 September. The Indigirka brought the initial shipment of nuclear warheads on 4 October.48 According to one source, this ship carried 99 nuclear charges?some two-thirds of all nuclear weapons sent to Cuba and over 20 times the explosive power dropped by all Allied bombers on Germany throughout World War II.49" (https://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol46no1/article06.html#rfn49 ) ... and its footnote... "49. Fursenko and Naftali, p. 217. There is conflicting source information on the number of warheads specifically for the SS-4 missiles. Gribkov states that 36 such warheads were introduced. This issue cannot be resolved based on current evidence, but 36 appears to be a likely figure as that tracks with Soviet doctrinal requirements for refire missiles." (https://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol46no1/article06.html#fn49 ) |
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: elids-ga on 01 Oct 2006 07:23 PDT |
No missiles were 'armed and ready' the launching pads were never fully constructed no missile was ever installed, much less 'armed and ready'. |
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: kemlo-ga on 01 Oct 2006 10:31 PDT |
It is thought that the Soviet army already in Cuba was equipped with low-yield tactical nuclear missiles. These would have been used if America had invaded Cuba |
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: dprk007-ga on 07 Oct 2006 19:14 PDT |
Kemlo Yuo say: "It is thought that the Soviet army already in Cuba was equipped with low-yield tactical nuclear missiles". Can you clarify what you mean by "low-yield nuclear missiles" ? DPRK007 |
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Oct 2006 02:22 PDT |
The Russians deployed the FROG-1 (Nato code-name real name unknown) It had a nominal yeild of 10 kilo-tons Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Cuban Missile Crisis
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Oct 2006 09:43 PDT |
Sorry I pressed post before i put these lincs in Kemlo http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=1409&fuseaction=library.document&id=15617 These events seemed dangerous at the time. But it wasn?t until nearly thirty years afterward that we learned, from General Gribkov?s testimony at a January 1992 conference here in this room in Havana, that the nuclear warheads for both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons had already reached Cuba before the quarantine line was established?162 nuclear warheads in all. If the president had gone ahead with the air strike and invasion of Cuba, the invasion forces almost surely would have been met by nuclear fire, requiring a nuclear response from the United States. http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002_11/cubanmissile.asp |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |