|
|
Subject:
front vs rear wheel drive in tanks
Category: Science > Technology Asked by: erichshih-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
09 Oct 2006 09:54 PDT
Expires: 08 Nov 2006 08:54 PST Question ID: 771988 |
what' is the difference between front wheel dirve and rear wheel drive in a tank? the german tanks in world war 2 all chose the former; whereras the russians, their t-34 for example, was rear wheel drive, as well as virtually all the main battle tanks designed and manufactured in the post war era? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: front vs rear wheel drive in tanks
From: kemlo-ga on 09 Oct 2006 11:12 PDT |
It has a lot to do with the type of transmission used along with the suspension. A good book is Design and Development of Fighting Vehicles by R. M. Ogorkiewicz Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: front vs rear wheel drive in tanks
From: stanmartin1952-ga on 09 Oct 2006 11:57 PDT |
Supposedly, part of the reason that the Germans lost the war is that their tanks were too expensive. |
Subject:
Re: front vs rear wheel drive in tanks
From: myoarin-ga on 09 Oct 2006 14:41 PDT |
I expect that the Germans started with a front wheel drive, which worked pretty well, and just stuck with once they had tooled up for production. Personally, I suspect that all the experience in the war showed that a rear wheel drive was better. The tracks become looser with use, longer, and it is probably better to have the rear wheels pulling the tracks and letting the play in them drape between the upper guide wheels, rather than a front wheel drive pulling the upper part of the tracks and having the slack on the ground. This may also reduce wear, since less of the track is under full tension. |
Subject:
Re: front vs rear wheel drive in tanks
From: dancethecon-ga on 11 Oct 2006 18:36 PDT |
stanmartin1952, My understanding is that Germany lost WWII for three reasons. Only one has to do with their tanks. 1. Germany tried to invade Russia, and couldn't get past the combination of Russian troops and Russian winter. If Germany hadn't expended that effort, the WWII might have been far different. 2. Germany didn't finish its atomic bomb project. 'Nuff said. 3. The tanks? The Panzers were WWII's best, but Germany didn't have enough gas for them at the end. Sorry, erichshih, I know this doesn't answer your question. dtc |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |