|
|
Subject:
Washcloth or no washcloth? (cleanliness and personal hygeine)
Category: Health Asked by: scrubbin2some-ga List Price: $2.50 |
Posted:
10 Oct 2006 00:02 PDT
Expires: 08 Nov 2006 23:02 PST Question ID: 772194 |
Cloth or No Cloth My partner and I are arguing about who has better personal hygeine. To cleanse himslef, he uses his hands and a bar of antibacterial soap in the shower once a day. To cleanse myself, I use a WASHCLOTH along with the antibacterial soap in the shower. I wash the washcloth every week with the rest of our towels. He would like you to know that I hang the washcloth on a hook in the shower against a wall that he views as moldy. He also wants you to know that the washcloth is "crunchy". I am pretty darn sure it'd due to the residual dial antibacterial deotorant soap and the lack of a fluff cycle. However, he suspects "foul play"?? that there is another reason for the washcloth crunchiness, but he does not hazard a guess as to what may cause the crunch. Keep in mind, he goes washcloth-less. Trust me, the crunch is soap and lack of the fluff from the dryer. As I type, he recites "and mold and hair". Trust me, I rinse the wash cloth out with soap before and after I use it each time, and run it through the wash every week. BOTTOM LINE: Who is the stankiest? Does MY washcloth (he suggests that I specify MY washcloth as opposed to a washcloth that is replaced daily, say in a swanky hotel) . . . Does MY washcloth help clean me better than his NO WASHCLOTH gentle hand caresses?? WASHCLOTH or NO WASHCLOTH?? Please reply and SOON!!! We will continue to be at each others' throats and shower heads (PRAYING to change the others' hygenic habits or lack thereof) until we hear from the Google geniuses. Gracias. - Josh and Jen - Jen and Josh wash cloth washcloth hygeine |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Washcloth or no washcloth? (cleanliness and personal hygeine)
From: keystroke-ga on 10 Oct 2006 22:55 PDT |
I would say that the biggest problem that both of you have is to be using antibacterial soap. It's a bad idea. "I am almost totally opposed to the general use of antibacterial soaps etc. There are a few studies ( I seem to recall one by Dr. Eli Perencevich) that indicate these soaps select for resistant strains of bacteria. Most microbiologists seem to agree (including me) that these soaps are unnecessary, and pose certain dangers. For my own personal health, I would never use antibacterial gels, washes, lotions etc. Soap (i.e., non-antibacterial) and water is by far a better approach since this age old practice sufficiently cleans hands and does not contribute to the advancement of resistant bacterial strains, nor does it eliminate all the "commensal bacteria"." http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01671.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibacterial_soap "At one conference, Dr. Stuart Levy, a microbiologist at Tufts University, cites these studies to conclude: Dousing everything we touch with antibacterial soaps and taking antibiotic medications at the first sign of a cold can upset the natural balance of microorganisms in and around us, leaving behind only the 'superbugs'." They might not cause any problems, but regular soap does just the same job without any possible health hazards. Washcloth or not, ditch the antibacterial soap. |
Subject:
Re: Washcloth or no washcloth? (cleanliness and personal hygeine)
From: myoarin-ga on 11 Oct 2006 03:41 PDT |
So much for the choice of soap. You could make a small concession with the washcloth and hang it outside the shower. Tell him you like a scratchier washcloth - I do. (Why does he care about that?) Maybe it does rub off the dead outer layer of skin better than bare hands. Maybe it saves a little on the amount of soap used. If that is of interest for an argument, you could start with separate bars or containers and test it. It WOULD be good for an argument: whose body surface is greater; who doesn't wash as thoroughly; who more often/less often/too often/not often enough? Incidentally, my urologist says it is best to wash one's private parts - fore and aft - with one's bare hand. Finally, you might settle the matter by agreeing that both can continue to wash themselves as they wish, but once a week both have to allow the other one to wash them their way. For a short time at least, that should eliminate any accusations about each other's level of cleanliness. All in the interest of good clean fun, Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Washcloth or no washcloth? (cleanliness and personal hygeine)
From: elids-ga on 11 Oct 2006 08:01 PDT |
I was about to post last night when they locked this question, why don't researchers find the question locked when I'm about to post my comments? ;-) Anyways, below what I meant to post. ------------ Although the subject is about a different matter entirely, according to this study http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/291/21/2639.pdf antibacterial soap is no better than regular soap. "The investigators found that handwashing is effective and that plain soap is as effective as antibacterial soap. This is not surprising, as it is the mechanical removal of bacteria from the hands that is important; soap facilitates this removal, and antibacterial products add little to the overall effectiveness of soap.11" other studies indicate that the use of anti-bacterial agents on your daily life increase not decrease your chances of infection due to bacterial evolutionary processes. That said, IMO the cloth helps scrub your skin better removing any impurities/toxins you may have on your skin. However the cloth itself also serves as breeding grounds for all types of micro-organisms, not all of them are bacteria, nor does antibacterial soap prevent all bacteria from multiplying. Specially if you rinse the soap out of the washcloth after you use it. So, basically you have a rag collecting micro-organisms all day (most likely mold) the moisture and skin residue (molds are parasitic, get their food by absorbing minerals, sugars and water from the plants, soil, animals or decaying matter upon which they live) in the washcloth serves as a the perfect environment for them to develop. So, you clean your skin better with a washcloth, but the washcloth adds at least mold to your skin. Quite possible other life-forms as well, likely archaea. Archaea branched off from bacteria long ago it is not likely to be affected by anti-bacterial soap residue (if there is any present), unfortunately we don't know if archaea affects humans or not, a recent paper seems to suggest some do http://www.asm.org/Media/index.asp?bid=42244 become human pathogens. Without the washcloth you may not scrub as deep but you certainly will not add anything to you skin. So basically it boils down to how clean is your bathroom, if you can say your bathroom is free of microbial life, then the washcloth is better, otherwise you are better off without it. Unless of course you have an appliance in which you can kill all microbial life, and you expose your washcloth to it every time before it gets used. |
Subject:
Re: Washcloth or no washcloth? (cleanliness and personal hygeine)
From: ccakbtch1-ga on 24 Oct 2006 23:06 PDT |
I prefer a buff-puff. the cheapy ones last about 2 weeks, so i spend only 2$ a month to exfoliate my skin. I rinse em in scalding hot water and air dry. then toss it out when it starts getting old. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |